From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B46334EF19; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 20:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760732025; cv=none; b=L8JoQFkN2/X5fw24zpxqpUTvjDzPCz7QVN0PyzJ3lDwc3XsDxuyV/ZGpmMxMTWo/H5umL/IjzEN2Y0LgzDXvjLgdfPyPT03A0a1fF1BwJ3dtE+Xgu2fC8K9AvoIXvcrCkDV7L4AAgm063dIiqGAwz3k/8yKVVBk/3QAQWQMJeOo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760732025; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fg/aDgFXGOW1dNkTiOLmBYlehTAOg3mQHbnGOOTiQNQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=E81W8re97RK0JfH6sOOws0R7OGeRmXWtue7OZmrOBwcnY9wHgyfYc/g4LBVjNNkthqr9aCQvo1jWMDdIZUvqCiZ/ekP+W/fHtkKTTDvC2rLoiIrryEvPD0RaMZVfVgZbIEf9RFaWq7cVLEd2ck+mKNx/kZ+UpdeXiAL/srPBAHM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=RlHRXSu/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="RlHRXSu/" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 17A0140B1D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1760732022; bh=fg/aDgFXGOW1dNkTiOLmBYlehTAOg3mQHbnGOOTiQNQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=RlHRXSu/C6Qmg6jjJj7MOhPh4UeloffbfhwsEdrprROFeZfvehBI+NJbNsGpiLq65 je4cLA2BJbneMA8DyNwMunOcKcaOb/edV3NZqM5UVJc1dTedBH/ZgLCW6ekwmyoVVn 41tn7NFh7tPUJVnEdULCT3Qy5qYXEH75zQQZ0UMWvuxgydUhs/h4+1tuP9+cjC5dCs yJtW+b6BhfUco/CXQugiaetRcWGPenPOy4/FbOhXep1ppJsiapclsEnIj4QsrEWLT1 w99JVYTgjnMsxKvf2QMt7sEDPBek6SDitWs9qffPQ3Ts0BIEJNUtA7ffez834UukgP CaSCIdhM/+Gwg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17A0140B1D; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 20:13:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/24] Split sphinx call logic from docs Makefile In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 14:13:41 -0600 Message-ID: <87cy6l1e2y.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > v8 contains a bug fix for ./tools/docs/check-variable-fonts.py command > line together with a new --deny-vf argument to it, plus addresses > a couple checkpatch warnings. Only 4 patches changed: patches 1, 2, 4 > and 5. I have just merged this series, along with the accumulated fixes, into docs-mw; after a month of separate exposure in docs-next, I don't think that there is a lot of benefit in waiting longer. It still makes me a bit nervous, hopefully all this will work out! jon