From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5AE381AAB for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706033521; cv=none; b=i/GnXDha7MOEa6nO3J/Q8I3OdF3dvZaKO4o0OTWNFEdUNFahDkSx7lO2HPLyB7XDG2hPYHdLBHbCom8Ux7oWa+b+hAIilsKLTmn9bRSXBPyY1rWWhLs+q36bmJ/t2ElLl+7tSxOBLCsl0vbyLc/OEtJlNCTp1z+HHQrXDBKzTwA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706033521; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ISWV8csFsQNy2o4E9SRS2nv/5aWjAjXjO+Lf3EGzUIs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SygUJFgkWo/KOICLcjP2HgYvlYWV9ZxbI6ZLcbuPH5lJoncPEzqSzfVN9AokhyvCAhwRN0O2iEI/N2r2Cv5BCbHqqsD5N7Nu9ESeNsmEs6by6RZmEDvGvHggxHHbud5lwL75qfRhRRy9pVvuS2DHes/PGOFPp316dNgXqglAWao= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lwmiTiov; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lwmiTiov" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706033519; x=1737569519; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=ISWV8csFsQNy2o4E9SRS2nv/5aWjAjXjO+Lf3EGzUIs=; b=lwmiTiov9CRWzGpSuvQQqKJ5gd/96VwCFiYIK21ap47+1u3PIWJ4olA+ uYp5ow0KJKua/tRBWA5YILjiDuqTPsFgbKnEOLdCxbnk83XEIAnguY0MF LHSEBlUXOdDElfhP8WtA6japHsPRU67Ba0IF0n4tjOcWqqHhvpiE/k/3t DrkRejaxKkicuAOT08P5wVjQv1qZo+GlUZ2uIqaLlmlgfO0NTrFF+ykRH jRvRCb0XIJ2UHljtVRRu3uzI7qpOXuQlCEK0fulHfJN305NpIm+/bVZS6 DOdZ64fWq7gGQ4BClJzuhjzCxcXqYfW67FWPuIdwAB90juLNbkbe5uj1z Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10962"; a="8366696" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,215,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="8366696" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2024 10:11:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,215,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="28103299" Received: from pzsolt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.40.183]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2024 10:11:57 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Akira Yokosawa , Jonathan Corbet , Vegard Nossum Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Akira Yokosawa Subject: Re: docs: requirements.txt has stopped working again In-Reply-To: <87y1cgm1nc.fsf@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <87y1cgm1nc.fsf@intel.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:11:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87cytrnclx.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, 23 Jan 2024, Jani Nikula wrote: > I looked into the root cause here. Sphinx since early versions > (predating even 2.4.4) depends on packages such as > > - sphinxcontrib-applehelp > - sphinxcontrib-devhelp > - sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp > - sphinxcontrib-qthelp > - sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml > > but does so without any version constraints. Recently, all of those > *packages* started first depending on Sphinx >= 5. Apparently this > prevented installation of incompatible combos, but resulted in circular > dependency issues in pip. See: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/11567 > To fix the circular dependencies, all of those *packages* made the > dependency on Sphinx >= 5 optional, but made the *extensions* in them > app.require_sphinx('5.0') runtime. This happened in the past two weeks. See: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/11890 BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel