From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B33F11CC158; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728933676; cv=none; b=TVG5ugrRxIbXK2YoOv43KFXolg9jKLhvQTQ1vINXLWi+GTkgfABfzKRU8a9hNd0e4bB6b9y2tvBjrBxHMjpm3Ga0mTerczDvMxQHuFPJJcrAuIHI7wsuZhdx63SalAIZVwBsANEHH4CN/Ezv16EWwrGata6cSqJx4JZzll9V6Zc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728933676; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EWO9FphDFiCQ5vH7ch25CvniUbz9Uqg7Sy/Ub8Gg80M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XpOuCCeELofQ2/URXMGSZIdyFnvvdBb94rvjk7VjN8bMFLMWpHthSpge9HT9k58j63cqIU6NFpnmmy7HyW9PTDysFYQ5Lx382ZZrYjLlFIRtw2ZK2jPVOYF2sXMdtFUKquHqU8W1PvtkpVtJB8i4/yaROh0qs67HLOn/pHBlj9A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=hBumXe42; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="hBumXe42" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net DF5E942BFE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1728933674; bh=yb7cwJ8k9w7LHa2Pxg7+b6c7gkrBhkiuqlch4nwOn5g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hBumXe42Hytqj42nN0KvqQth+9UWD9ig4MzZ4AFlIPHoKvLH+xupiRFeJCLmWHDTQ 0iMxGAO1pZ1hz4952CMCuFZOBuRXZPChFJBw6ylNAd6+M9SACfzUtKusxpbpIKK3Ub H8Sl9zR1NLgoHmTPEILvulpZPymxFhvFW9S6iv1tK8LE1Yx/4/Jey2H0vetY7v6UmF BQcu4Jj1Ak6kVbgTiuvt8cmn0BMDzuMDYAnSwb16CWrdqa1d4DITjpusAUWOuHjjNl OWVL5Sa319N0H5TvxGDoAxR+1bWQ47+U5mP09iKZQ74UObeEy83+BG0XPHM41nSAmU 2WFcWydPdiBsQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF5E942BFE; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:21:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Alex Shi , jiang.kun2@zte.com.cn, alexs@kernel.org, siyanteng@loongson.cn, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mudongliangabcd@gmail.com Cc: wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn, fan.yu9@zte.com.cn, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, he.peilin@zte.com.cn, tu.qiang35@zte.com.cn, qiu.yutan@zte.com.cn, zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Docs/zh_CN: Translate physical_memory.rst to Simplified Chinese In-Reply-To: References: <20241012171357153parWX6Has5WheQyGlP0kP@zte.com.cn> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:21:12 -0600 Message-ID: <87ed4isd7b.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Alex Shi writes: > Hi Jiang, > > Your patch format is still odd in 'Subject': > Subject: =?UTF-8?B?wqBbUEFUQ0ggdjVdIERvY3MvemhfQ046IFRyYW5zbGF0ZSBwaHlzaWNhbF9tZW1vcnkucnN0IHRvIFNpbXBsaWZpZWTCoENoaW5lc2U=?= > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="UTF-8" > X-MAIL:mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 49C9DsLB077233 > X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true > X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 670A3DD9.001/4XQd8n4BCPz5B1DK > > It should a English word. > You need to send patch to yourself and apply it to check if > everything all right. I think the formatting is OK - the patch applies fine here. I would appreciate a review of the actual content, though...:) Thanks, jon