From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C30B433E66 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 13:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783950591; cv=none; b=AZQbCigPxWtbUEaW2OKfm1BcUjX6WDUIsF5VQsLcMGyGuJAioe7zyORkQ8Mjp08n2guQJ/lut9DDJoqo6/0bx26PnrUMMgNwNrB1DcCywRuKMgPaPiz+GydoFhY52Wr6HZkqVs1o6iY6GzY97WyWnUsDp2REj5fRWTPPm2HeDd0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783950591; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PokocmR9VjH792T9hEpK01TnYL3laM0HlE47t+N2qQQ=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=U44mquwW/qPmEMQyF6qqZgLR2t9BXELURIsdJARnn2ODMtoumCT6J6L3RbiPzteyrliH9KVwZPohH/lehzusrARQNJfdmpToxCsa4E4PCcH0Rqs/UdVDm39CXrB7yBSimSxep0DSTMY91Q+thM0GF91NxSRibK3XuEvRltlMj7Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=PgGQJMLa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="PgGQJMLa" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 48E83410E2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1783950583; bh=Ax8ej4eBUVP+xEvgv8ODOC1k+Omp4pxd/3lwjtz7z4A=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=PgGQJMLaRUoLTSvCsb6z/KNQpF/CKNe1+WsLu3dMuB80Ilganq/94OvZygup+LbFi VijuQkep37gokdR0OZlTsJWqofDSG1ujIGHm6q8OJ1sLuTi/ouY5geRVoMkmV+AOjX c4VnmBtkB3VcLP+3+cKm67pwgs9oHQIFujuvrHuC3pWrB8goH8Dsh/a5pOoTr3GDQe BEoxjTT8/vZ1OEFibFZVAJ2GAuT2bxxHUrmFc8RAnHY5vIAdpvrv+VMcWsHif+YPyC mFxE4WaVa4uZGvEXlLCYG/yROyhx6efn0BLLsIIJplbd2ag96JAPNxvi1U63C1SBha 0weZHuJPIHe2A== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48E83410E2; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 13:49:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Daniel Pereira , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question regarding CC list for pt_BR translation patches In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 07:49:42 -0600 Message-ID: <87fr1nhudl.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Daniel Pereira writes: > Could you please clarify if you prefer to be CC'd on these translation > patches, or is sending them solely to the mailing list sufficient for > your review? I want to make sure we are following the community's best > practices. It's always best to CC the maintainer(s) directly. I do keep an eye on the list, but the chances of something falling through the cracks are higher if it is not sent to me directly as well. Thanks, jon