From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E68142E83; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762212935; cv=none; b=S32SGGmF232yrexyX9IDD19D93rVrtMFWcXJtL5Hv4LEJgkdBLKxvfNVL7dgtzBvQ9S92v6H0XVU2lwlzF1cOiPXN3Y/4H71J13lDSZ9pA7TaTGK5mFgG+O861vPjQIlW/KLXHHAMpJHTGWnTJa4jLaeBf8P7nFu7iw8ILK2Zog= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762212935; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8q5djkQgi9ATG594fdKrpiHqqoFLfmBs6o2tSOJKmrA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TT2TJc5+hhlKxhxUwvaV4x3Yg725nObae5F2EKbjZv92k3uWrtmIC7A1sFegBB4ZSlx9IBqWfEfKvDVddR4hr3RIeRrQP2PTZaQAoNBPlNXDPv4ByfFLGkBVptuUtHslDu5OAY4acyxVqG5AtiJ2YQzTl/u2n4k+CGT287Pegl0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=miw76KJz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="miw76KJz" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net BCC2840AED DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1762212933; bh=8q5djkQgi9ATG594fdKrpiHqqoFLfmBs6o2tSOJKmrA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=miw76KJzANTlPp/FaYCIpqdzrI47P7DUX12kPe1mVu021fJ/HVl6sF2HWuLdjma/T HoqLRME5MfKP6jGWHeqcsX4EA2v+TBSfCveylOmdaCEREvsp1Ihu8162McjfQpZcd+ u8k74vTn8FGpX+TuYLAs+us1an7KP2PVysmcbJO1qzGjrgCmvELslJzK6JWDkhAYll GOCyxHa3U4y8QZiowrwh3Kkg2MGIjEaeZ56GyGxZvHo93G7cbft4M8Tla1lsYzPRvY 5xDHzWjXvxipLfO+9UD9Ba1gWKdgxAR7mJz9/BZAif8ycLHPpht/GmnF8b78JyR9RL MV+FJXNq6niCQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCC2840AED; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:35:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Tomas Glozar , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , John Kacur , Luis Goncalves , Costa Shulyupin , Crystal Wood , Attila Fazekas , Tomas Glozar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Documentation/rtla: Cover default options In-Reply-To: <20251010083338.478961-1-tglozar@redhat.com> References: <20251010083338.478961-1-tglozar@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 16:35:32 -0700 Message-ID: <87fraubsfv.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Tomas Glozar writes: > RTLA has many options that have a default value that is used when > the option is not set associated with them. Those are not covered in > the documentation for the options, which creates confusion among users. > > Document the default behavior for all relevant options: -H, -P, -C, > --trace-buffer-size. Some of these are covered in general > descriptions, only missing from the option documentation. > > Also, fix a few typos and incorrect naming of tracers. So I see that this series is still unapplied...should I take it through docs? Thanks, jon