From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1252922DFBA; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758037658; cv=none; b=ae4qxd1GVvoOdy6svXMvjmbUf7148yIZqrx2ZGzdqOFlYVtfN7K7IZH6QcVsAbk2aAUGulLxUrXbI+cCn3BNSz47RyjjzGfIdCFMrKqv+PBWd4qdQRv//s5ICsnaMnUyxDHaRgEYJXJfcQqXJ5ZrXd2ak5fg8l/wPahmALIr75Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758037658; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vQ9B2iUnNZwG8Jf0xXqhxgu2CFfLj3gTrzREA6RdRxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ALJkIzwhws0mF6iSGZFwk8bNxc8HIkcwayGwWSiD1TbAnKkFxE05aa0nxIsKuR62sDGM9i/jnivSPpaUEMDLQ7Q26+arLAxTKQD+rW0hsJdSuCvhM9/ec+4KquqByjTdmflbx0YBZ/V36+iog6S6VVD0oU49Qzd17y6/XIXd1us= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=YHdRnjIS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="YHdRnjIS" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3658E40AFB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1758037656; bh=gbdugd49qh7DwyvYegacQ+jlw4svGsINKMwBxGYinG0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=YHdRnjISGGDUB6h/RB933iVB5TA4QeJQ22EZT3o0DZUr5Hg65FxAzWpgT2d/zKaUb 6WHH5LJ+Vf7Tc86evXQKGWj4zLXQ8B4lP2FO1hTJibmM0rpdEjcAjtqFB2ruKIoQlH WCRHo/T+J2JkxP3bKz2waSEmHeYPtqpLAzkXzSlE7TYzg3eHveOv+Svno7GifCwtAI vWuFR6RAeIcuen/spY0Y1HMR5uYf3YZtpM8CapkjOhQ6Hg1mMb80DFkZg9rNilHFLw FaM3266QtlDJKN1CRkL1yMsgtY0K4OarMiASE/a/R/3MIGcF+QfdqLCjb5MWsWCes/ CgXqWj6lYjWqA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3658E40AFB; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:47:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/21] Split sphinx call logic from docs Makefile In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:47:35 -0600 Message-ID: <87frcmflgo.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > This series should probably be called: > > "Move the trick-or-treat build hacks accumulated over time > into a single place and document them." This one doesn't apply - it looks like the same encoding problems with the translation changes...? jon