From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE5762248AA for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 19:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750362708; cv=none; b=XOiOx3TDdEE3/GHPdn90ATBXyMytQWS3zidEEEkhrCiAdqtemaVuXpDrkuelbZy1qT2Ps4IgIyHsMmDN8a4Cbay5nJN1AaINhmtypjByB0YEzfB/dSK46q8mawR5R55HjFgJ/aKBU3+PpgdMP/Tr01KMXwb2JIWePVFJEpBtfGI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750362708; c=relaxed/simple; bh=m+IS52kyLR92meFMSc55i6NzxbfxCW0kDeKpWYzBkLA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CfNGDqd4LVenPs8EYublpNbBevSv6WdfrBwGbvE9r3O0DpIhFlfC72AZori2QOs591dJ+YfxOc2DoDdcmbJbvYbntZP7YYdXBNHIOikuoi8blhc5VOiWaHiEiqeXJkS9E731K7boPXhUz/enNKKGfA+k4Qy8Rv3OdumnJqGbP2U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=shQsfOY5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="shQsfOY5" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net CCEDB41AD8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1750362706; bh=EX5ea/huQRHSAu4M5JjXieZ/TdJW2jjEvrEQutLyR3o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=shQsfOY5kqQ2Q9FcN6ATLObYGv8ixYm+2TqcMLH0vkgX44307a5zG3HqwYifgLsch iVAD62ChSO7bz2pRab0zEJ2hZhg+2O7BHsKLfmJd48mTpI49LQTUenyg8oVzNUqvuo XS3vaZriCIv4u09XVXytEAkCgf2CM/GVFJXk1Ybm/G3h8K0sOATDGNFLy+VF7x20+o 3iOVBNb46dtQ2ijhy+sSCr4kg8TsDPGNibGN/jyKsvI0AcpXT/beALu58wgdZeIEyw QVviM8BaS+RAuAJtn+3TgTdWfFVeumSq3JvsNBH9r27QGoJDaGQOY0hGm4vuit+yBN GGscyGxqj8M8Q== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCEDB41AD8; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 19:51:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Konstantin Ryabitsev , Akira Yokosawa Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: Error at www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/ since next-20250610 In-Reply-To: <20250617-translucent-crouching-poodle-a826e2@lemur> References: <20250617-translucent-crouching-poodle-a826e2@lemur> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:51:45 -0600 Message-ID: <87frfvh5m6.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Konstantin Ryabitsev writes: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:18:22PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >> I'm not sure but there might have been some minor incompatibility >> between past versions of dependencies. >> >> I'd rather upgrade Sphinx to 8.2.3 (latest). >> >> Konstantin, could you try it? > > Looks like 8.2.3 requires python-3.11, which I don't have readily > available on the system that builds the documentation. However, > upgrading to 7.4 also fixed the problem, so the latest next tree is > now built and should be propagating shortly. [Catching up after some much-needed time in the wilderness...] Konstantin, is there any easy way to get a notification when the build there fails? I was entirely unaware of the problem, needless to say. Once I've dug out a little further, I'll try to figure out why my change makes things explode. It really shouldn't...so it should be possible to find a way to work around the problem and avoid putting in version requirements (and tests) that we haven't needed so far. Thanks, jon