From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF5453E7BCE for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784293725; cv=none; b=ZSpZLac/rKoxE4nqvTvRfhIVvgDdyMYQyAwaV4PL363uoIXMhUTlo+i4QPzTdiyjKOen+ArosOuqPERClCEareADSU1ejZYaKaRHjaeXNcjt6Uza372lWYe+IB79NJ+IlKpEYAjKiWX0FLsQ1yZm4lRN/8IiTfcHkEleZxPNd/s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784293725; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0xDxRyVJQiuRip4rMo+SF9eG3bVA84LaJSEOk56UQnk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DcJxbni0MLiTgFm6YZKIgNhicm0akdzpKLVmDHChXnIUMsGawP5hhr/nkC8oMwofNk1HFTcPXCjFPnbPGxpzWpDKJY0dB8p5SiFYa+3WB3NfIK+JQHdwuG9kz5ql0Gn6EWUB0hx/hCgWyUaatEvcGrPMKB4TI4rckb3vuJU3ou4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=RbguzZlD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="RbguzZlD" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 245E7408B2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1784293723; bh=Gh4uDXXp2/8D4NIaLe2vWOPzePQFI9cqK5ecz3F++5Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=RbguzZlDaY6EwNAdrk1/9thDo+3dMayKVj4DzghsghZ2yZMl+T/FspnVWYo2P4F1v a21T4YEbPBY7SFYkxYthi/W8cGlSAgS+FeOkXyPzsDRn4Pdefzj/BLagIsBf/ldnyD LIAXs5OknQXAz6lVzWpqoSpHS1qyVHrIIqRTW0e89rFsJr9oY0ktri4IVG0iHr6wjh uMPcht2XxV3txij+rygtCDrYSX4/rPJFqu5Zl+VMh11w3ZsS+oNjjvX9/vTmy72DWR UZgEqLQ8HIIEZgdmH+E2Ovuc8WZEo4twr1bpY8tC/8QTmU8ZTSqNUrQ0Qm6yuEtcpT ZfDVwxOSwzURA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 245E7408B2; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:08:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Daniel Pereira Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: In-Reply-To: References: <20260716021013.48025-1-danielmaraboo@gmail.com> <87ldba5z1u.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 07:08:42 -0600 Message-ID: <87h5lx69wl.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Daniel Pereira writes: > Regarding the conflict issue, I would be happy to take on the > responsibility of organizing these patches to help save you time. > Would you prefer if I acted as a point of contact for these > translations? I could collect submissions from contributors, merge > them into the structure correctly, and then send them to you as a > single, cleaned-up set of patches. > > Please let me know if this workflow would be helpful or if you have a > different preference for how I should handle these conflicts. I think that if you organize the index.rst files as I suggested (i.e. roughly along the lines of the English versions) most of the conflicts will go away, and the result will better generally. That's the best place to start, I think. Thanks, jon