From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65064212FB3; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751399576; cv=none; b=mfLW9XNCxPYfbBQYKvQBCrbiat5VgAlYIZWlYmUVC8y1MlW6BWJ019J4+6aXi4fwUF64IzaEnIcAm46jtZtowKFha9/9TP4cbyXs0BHZonamqPRpv5tItEBpXGkkI3RnG06K2SthUCkQATVPFPg5Qk6JhoZ+AeiTP4KaMO5BrOQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751399576; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tlI5WAGL4cY5b5K3SdGSrgyCIbCBiIRYipbCPeodI/c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=t7Xie/AvOOivJWxPKozPBJRrvJupYJeeM15/zbtzIQm9E6jdlO1FSQLZxzNJKXG+goNnGFlwb42aemYB4Wsou1+p/jUtJ0oRYenPePV5wu7ZW+G/MtJfDcn39WO8Z6LKu8JOnxDL1jaCFM7bbUo9kuiuw0DtTqHnSYDuNnW7KRo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=YCq4GADN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="YCq4GADN" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 60ED9406FC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1751399574; bh=aIeBd2OXbU1kHcQ7pxghx4PCbNhBNaE25FKmGQqhIAY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=YCq4GADN/OQZTw0UOndGJ3C8RIhnfiah+nC478siCIpaRCRVPjehMH5MaeksyHQbO tIVkgdMOhFdoqchxoZho9N5BIHwVMbLjMGwfKyNMHhzqDJVghpVV/GqBiiPBK9vku7 a5YnFNbsAY1w+amrXi1LCTbbtiEyyu7nG2V5ohGoQmA+Nghz3NVrZtKKrMZVHzNuJS KD9eeqz5M8Nq4ftOKZMoI4EJZOoqVhlR4uXt2X2k1gmzB2lJ+z7sph2MWdFMS0kcdY EWz+/EPBUACcVJHVvgUfqdN9BfhSgEqQ48q5z19W6gEZVCwq57o6UCy7ATKZ51WSu+ E5Bkd3nE/WjSA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60ED9406FC; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:52:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation , Linux ext4 , Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ext4 docs toctree reorganization In-Reply-To: <20250701194535.GI9987@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250620105643.25141-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com> <87y0t7rajm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20250701194535.GI9987@frogsfrogsfrogs> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 13:52:53 -0600 Message-ID: <87h5zvr8mi.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Darrick J. Wong" writes: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 01:11:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Bagas Sanjaya writes: >> >> > Hi Jon, hi Ted, >> > >> > While discussing on my previous ext4 docs reorganization attempt >> > by merging contents [1], Jon suggested that considering current docs >> > file structure, a proper toctree would be ideal [2]. So, here's >> > the patchset that does exactly that. >> > >> > Actual conversion to toctree structure is in [1/5], while the rest >> > is cleanups to make the resulting toctree nicer. >> > >> > This patchset is based on docs-next tree. >> >> So to me this seems like an improvement. I'm happy to take it, though >> would prefer an ack from ext4land if possible. > > I did, yesterday: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/87y0t7rajm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net/T/#mc3ea7f04fc1b0e4294bce6bd60f5f605017f6f7c > > Though I'm also happy not to be thought of as part of 'ext4land' ;) Yup, I have your ack ... if that's good enough I'll proceed. You can be from wherever you want as far as I'm concerned :) Thanks, jon