From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36A22190055; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 20:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725567479; cv=none; b=mbLuTaor5SNQoXrvKzo5hlvJTOY29ykMPPBqOp/QqUnwqz782SRxtoNiIoMUCECKHdA05ptiSA0v+HUxL5082OrgrFw/Daq4tshpyHHYhIQsnjl4Lus2u2E5fLiVjj8NXtx99PrMKqH4wygQGoQywWEMZUqB5cWclsd5wgs2SDg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725567479; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wgCX2P89enDP7fyw28TP3GzsbnztZIdW3SWCToc4tzI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Hc2ClghhX9vzzi0Cp9uvTOWI085Xt5dise9vx3wuVj1Y0q/lrmTupHRvpPs6igeiP1eVT9V+iKG2IQT0WBjvzpM13+wv7hsWkO1HXItQp+zbiyfeSCEOjPadc5g3IdS592lli0y3s3q7G6lbr/Crfs7EvO9SrlQlDnOw62+Wn8o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=DohT/nJc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="DohT/nJc" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 1DE8242B25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1725567477; bh=UqWrUmM2bMyQ/iZJMIRa6thiolbg9GoeQe+ABfT/Rq4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=DohT/nJc3RtO2qLcUB/tbJgJDk7pMc5XlWtUiDMX2fg1rfUjmUcQwbgP5ACDdIWHQ Cmig/HiD9SHbr7Dzova25igWIcsxx2BHb98Vu/tjiQDfbZA0DCqyXdav7vf6AfgmDo dMU2pLJNipCe7T9EtfhfnNLlQwqiTLBojnXZ+lJhOdfpHSqMNpbTr3tqbdvLW88cD6 rsjIaWXq8w7Bno+H0jTMDjk1LGERJYtxX/qjV3Wqd0GS0cSmIPaadLrGsPU5mJkpba 8aJjsbWeLfrcp0MDI1Fwls99cUw3S5MnGCx0uAmjX0saA9jesZhfaowMW5MFSqsGXT kOxCk8gy0lVFg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DE8242B25; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 20:17:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: I Hsin Cheng Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, I Hsin Cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: scheduler: completion: Update member of struct completion In-Reply-To: <20240828165036.178011-1-richard120310@gmail.com> References: <20240828165036.178011-1-richard120310@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 14:17:56 -0600 Message-ID: <87h6athn2j.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain I Hsin Cheng writes: > The member "wait" in struct completion isn't of type wait_queue_head_t > anymore, as it is now "struct swait_queue_head", fix it to match with > the current implementation. > > Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng > --- > Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst > index f19aca2062bd..adf0c0a56d02 100644 > --- a/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst > +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/completion.rst > @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ which has only two fields:: > > struct completion { > unsigned int done; > - wait_queue_head_t wait; > + struct swait_queue_head wait; > }; Applied, thanks. jon