From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@corigine.com,
"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: kernel-doc: Always increment warnings counter
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:18:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h74o1nzk.fsf@meer.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220613090510.3088294-1-niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com> writes:
> Some warnings do not increment the warnings counter making the behavior
> of running kernel-doc with -Werror unlogical as some warnings will be
> generated but not treated as errors.
>
> Fix this by creating a helper function that always incrementing the
> warnings counter every time a warning is emitted. There is one location
> in get_sphinx_version() where a warning is not touched as it concerns
> the execution environment of the kernel-doc and not the documentation
> being processed.
>
> Incrementing the counter only have effect when running kernel-doc in
> either verbose mode (-v or environment variable KBUILD_VERBOSE) or when
> treating warnings as errors (-Werror or environment variable
> KDOC_WERROR). In both cases the number of warnings printed is printed to
> stderr and for the later the exit code of kernel-doc is non-zero if
> warnings where encountered.
>
> Simple test case to demo one of the warnings,
>
> $ cat test.c
> /**
> * foo() - Description
> */
> int bar();
>
> # Without this change
> $ ./scripts/kernel-doc -Werror -none test.c
> test.c:4: warning: expecting prototype for foo(). Prototype was for
> bar() instead
>
> # With this change
> $ ./scripts/kernel-doc -Werror -none test.c
> test.c:4: warning: expecting prototype for foo(). Prototype was for
> bar() instead
> 1 warnings as Errors
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>
> ---
> * Changes since v1
> - Added a helper emit_warning() to print the message and increment the
> counter instead of adding statements to increment the counter where it
> was missing.
Thanks for making this change. Anything that rationalizes this horrific
script even a little bit is more than welcome.
I've applied the patch, thanks.
jon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-13 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-13 9:05 [PATCH v2] scripts: kernel-doc: Always increment warnings counter Niklas Söderlund
2022-06-13 17:18 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h74o1nzk.fsf@meer.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund@corigine.com \
--cc=oss-drivers@corigine.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).