From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25C82369985; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774890188; cv=none; b=c2YrBOn1pybgt4PNsJ1NmUESqGxOj9DGEqI9h7jzY+3QJf41rJexaKM494GGLBnc4d2fv6qzTWgQHln0oErUssG1NNJ+eD2/ZPJBlxwm3DSmdM5A5g6ZXJtHx1vfrvCkrsmGyRS5l2nHi1YqNzPIjJyku7o9Jc6/YJ9InWyHDNI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774890188; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q7xKbRz0+gaT57ra7L4y2lOaXhY8zaftbWtQ5kC93Hk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ksUMoNl8mSdyGmx7gxOJusNeHjthogJO+mhLb2l0/KMjs/i79gUQA6ZIktJ0sdK9vN3BiXGtxKwAvYDFBTQqoYFjP/xEFXSsgF/wnfoRgL64Yqzi4qRFsC30iv+D0B7lKLT6wV2DwiLBQRUfDXnqbhs1ArlsjMlKpkkcexKiV+4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=s7RgPMFz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="s7RgPMFz" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 6FA56411C2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1774890186; bh=LUDSAEbcy/Ks3bczFDg2JV+IiP4oX1z6FtakAazPjjE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=s7RgPMFzsMteaUxvq2/tdctIIjHDoDXSvKIHlBlPcucfO9Z/AjtemnOgHQX93xe3E ybkqYDdnSsPtroHXVAspux3aRPev39g6zfaRpZrl0tiXbTLOQVjfXitGNWQGBScSIU dOObZJXEo8jePthjJI7nZYMjyDTwkugTMKq60n6yuTEZnAi5Ak8QN3zQfs9FHeEjM1 b0ZukJ849iiQE+dMPKxTgrR12Al2lDgmOu3PLw5mBu+ljyiPLvUmqju/z4qYdSDwsB FevZRJTazVWvAsciXg5WW6+qbdybuFCiDgVK7w3qubbxEqZRFkKU1IMrhTjpPJ0IOR QxP+8/SrW03+Q== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FA56411C2; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:03:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Zenghui Yu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, "Zenghui Yu (Huawei)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: proc: remove description of prof_cpu_mask In-Reply-To: <20260311070940.94838-1-zenghui.yu@linux.dev> References: <20260311070940.94838-1-zenghui.yu@linux.dev> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:03:04 -0600 Message-ID: <87ikadmerb.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Zenghui Yu writes: > From: "Zenghui Yu (Huawei)" > > Commit 2e5449f4f21a ("profiling: Remove create_prof_cpu_mask().") said that > no one would create /proc/irq/prof_cpu_mask since commit 1f44a225777e > ("s390: convert interrupt handling to use generic hardirq", 2013). Remove > the outdated description. > > While at it, fix another minor typo (s/DMS/DMA/). > > Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu (Huawei) > --- > Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 12 ++++-------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. jon