From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
andrii@kernel.org, mhal@rbox.co, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
daniel@iogearbox.net, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
horms@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, eddyz87@gmail.com,
cong.wang@bytedance.com, shuah@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
kpsingh@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v7 2/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 15:50:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikqcdvm9.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250116140531.108636-3-mrpre@163.com> (Jiayuan Chen's message of "Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:05:28 +0800")
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 10:05 PM +08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> 'sk->copied_seq' was updated in the tcp_eat_skb() function when the
> action of a BPF program was SK_REDIRECT. For other actions, like SK_PASS,
> the update logic for 'sk->copied_seq' was moved to
> tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser() to ensure the accuracy of the 'fionread' feature.
>
> It works for a single stream_verdict scenario, as it also modified
> 'sk_data_ready->sk_psock_verdict_data_ready->tcp_read_skb'
> to remove updating 'sk->copied_seq'.
>
> However, for programs where both stream_parser and stream_verdict are
> active(strparser purpose), tcp_read_sock() was used instead of
> tcp_read_skb() (sk_data_ready->strp_data_ready->tcp_read_sock)
> tcp_read_sock() now still update 'sk->copied_seq', leading to duplicated
> updates.
>
> In summary, for strparser + SK_PASS, copied_seq is redundantly calculated
> in both tcp_read_sock() and tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser().
>
> The issue causes incorrect copied_seq calculations, which prevent
> correct data reads from the recv() interface in user-land.
>
> We do not want to add new proto_ops to implement a new version of
> tcp_read_sock, as this would introduce code complexity [1].
>
> We add new callback for strparser for customized read operation, also as
> a wrapper function it provides abstraction use psock.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241218053408.437295-1-mrpre@163.com
> Fixes: e5c6de5fa025 ("bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling copied_seq")
> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> index 47f65b1b70ca..6dcde3506a9b 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> @@ -646,6 +646,47 @@ static int tcp_bpf_assert_proto_ops(struct proto *ops)
> ops->sendmsg == tcp_sendmsg ? 0 : -ENOTSUPP;
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
> +static int tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
> + sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
> +{
> + struct sk_psock *psock;
> + struct tcp_sock *tp;
> + int copied = 0;
> +
> + tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + psock = sk_psock(sk);
> + if (WARN_ON(!psock)) {
> + desc->error = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + psock->ingress_bytes = 0;
> + /* We could easily add copied_seq and noack into desc then call
> + * ops->read_sock without calling symbol directly. But unfortunately
> + * most descriptors used by other modules are not inited with zero.
> + * Also it not work by replacing ops->read_sock without introducing
> + * new ops as ops itself is located in rodata segment.
> + */
> + copied = tcp_read_sock_noack(sk, desc, recv_actor, true,
> + &psock->copied_seq);
> + if (copied < 0)
> + goto out;
> + /* recv_actor may redirect skb to another socket(SK_REDIRECT) or
> + * just put skb into ingress queue of current socket(SK_PASS).
> + * For SK_REDIRECT, we need 'ack' the frame immediately but for
> + * SK_PASS, the 'ack' was delay to tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser()
> + */
> + tp->copied_seq = psock->copied_seq - psock->ingress_bytes;
> + tcp_rcv_space_adjust(sk);
> + __tcp_cleanup_rbuf(sk, copied - psock->ingress_bytes);
> +out:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return copied;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER */
> +
> int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool restore)
> {
> int family = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TCP_BPF_IPV6 : TCP_BPF_IPV4;
> @@ -681,6 +722,12 @@ int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool restore)
>
> /* Pairs with lockless read in sk_clone_lock() */
> sock_replace_proto(sk, &tcp_bpf_prots[family][config]);
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_STREAM_PARSER)
> + if (psock->progs.stream_parser && psock->progs.stream_verdict) {
> + psock->copied_seq = tcp_sk(sk)->copied_seq;
> + psock->read_sock = tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock;
Just directly set psock->strp.cb.read_sock to tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock.
Then we don't need this intermediate psock->read_sock callback, which
doesn't do anything useful.
> + }
> +#endif
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_bpf_update_proto);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-18 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-16 14:05 [PATCH bpf v7 0/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation and add tests Jiayuan Chen
2025-01-16 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf v7 1/5] strparser: add read_sock callback Jiayuan Chen
2025-01-18 14:56 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-01-16 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf v7 2/5] bpf: fix wrong copied_seq calculation Jiayuan Chen
2025-01-18 14:50 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2025-01-18 15:29 ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-01-20 3:35 ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-01-20 10:13 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-01-16 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf v7 3/5] bpf: disable non stream socket for strparser Jiayuan Chen
2025-01-18 15:03 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-01-18 15:32 ` Jiayuan Chen
2025-01-16 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf v7 4/5] selftests/bpf: fix invalid flag of recv() Jiayuan Chen
2025-01-16 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf v7 5/5] selftests/bpf: add strparser test for bpf Jiayuan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ikqcdvm9.fsf@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=mrpre@163.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).