From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDAB13B5F59; Fri, 15 May 2026 14:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778856301; cv=none; b=pBkDr6TLfwFQZQ4x9TaUsdJUPdGILz5Hu1LLPazBTxvhjcZzchSG392sb12WyFmkm6kpGtczpTUOaJpXGkxrh2AwZI05IpvFOuqdcHigerUYJlfjyaHOYyoCVSPALEG4I0ACpRnXB8jHK1rscR+AvhxYqR4avQtcxY/PBBWNY64= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778856301; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FXsV0hKANa41CWOUZra6TxD6kV8gSzj5zY4Vsy/aYYI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TRwpUOzqdHfv1qfbWApZd6EHc/0EAeSMZBNdOcDyp7n627obW2hFHSL+hZTSnzcDn8qjwvo9KQ+IUOq166EZ/7Yccs0eDoqdeivKGZrCH/zYI44mxMpyDsZhS94OJl/9YUZbbnJycFuvP2dn5ZOfw+P7GwNXzCJlfchWmdHKvMI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=ZFj8EEe2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="ZFj8EEe2" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net B7D4B410B5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1778856298; bh=Xv69UPFCYWawf5NXIfN0oK2PS/0QmJx70Y4JvKXEhtE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ZFj8EEe2IRJ7IUu9QCzbhWBJb0UGVdTYjORTs7i8eqqNMxvs8vZX3cuNNWG4r45R7 vxocNRo7R3vIsASQsw4sWh4WImkGgz/5rHw2fPAcCMxtTnKeNfXun+zn14ncFwwcJV XQN3Nc3ggl0FTcBTFYVgZ/ZN99IWzqEYX12d1N8vr8Q+vI5XoxR85+YrPo3Aey+AJV +nBcu7tfzzGDz+T9kgyc+1FhNUHEqfIrsCdK3NDe69DTXZZ/+YHFevYwemYyQjH9DS g8eCKPtMlBDjjoZ4WERVlytsF4CajA2ZF+lC84Heur/tAPn45ndMkTTjoy0PFx7R2M 4bRHjmqJLku7Q== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b:67c:16ff:fe81:5f9b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7D4B410B5; Fri, 15 May 2026 14:44:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Chao Gao , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Chao Gao , Dave Hansen , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: core-api/cpu_hotplug: Remove stale cpu0_hotplug docs In-Reply-To: <20260507134732.254617-1-chao.gao@intel.com> References: <20260507134732.254617-1-chao.gao@intel.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 08:44:57 -0600 Message-ID: <87jyt4pw9i.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Chao Gao writes: > Commit e59e74dc48a3 ("x86/topology: Remove CPU0 hotplug option") > removed the 'cpu0_hotplug' option, but its documentation remained in > cpu_hotplug.rst. Remove the stale entry. > > Reported-by: Dave Hansen > Signed-off-by: Chao Gao > --- > Documentation/core-api/cpu_hotplug.rst | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/cpu_hotplug.rst b/Documentation/core-api/cpu_hotplug.rst > index 9b4afca9fd09..6de26d1c6a9a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/core-api/cpu_hotplug.rst > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/cpu_hotplug.rst > @@ -45,11 +45,6 @@ Command Line Switches > > This option is limited to the X86 and S390 architecture. > > -``cpu0_hotplug`` > - Allow to shutdown CPU0. > - > - This option is limited to the X86 architecture. > - Applied, thanks. jon