From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB4482BDC13 for ; Sun, 3 May 2026 15:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777820835; cv=none; b=Sahz+bVdW2lRerAInQ1VU9klBENltkihUMxmHr5DPnaMJO46w27ccbSIg3c+8s0CZoWFIGjMx3qZoTRUsyoV+QEgEDIyCFI3H8TOv1JpCRzWufaHJfMBg38FK0QeWujSLQlM6DyKHDaFyTVhz+nQdcunD6VAT8XuzbRxEOUZA6U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777820835; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5uW4ZJSgpIOGW4q56yU7dBOVfhqRcO6lJOpx2qGWIUw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=B0MKnAkG+RmQj0jVCER3gJfcN0oP8xfSBzTSQhognS2lDT/rWWYxMO61a7kx/gT5uzpiipFu4rO8tKlSpXE0hqY2SsgocXhM8qqrQXQIPHDaSW2V6F6yeBbooXt69xzk9IJ31+2c+EGz6Cs+IkPXCiQQJDZOYxW7sr69uwqtTtQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=cMHKPiCE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="cMHKPiCE" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net F07E441084 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1777820834; bh=6z+M2m2MxAj6SxCGicBZW17oGuFWfkStgD8Mnh4k2KY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=cMHKPiCEp9izQIwICxrEwLrO2esZ9DyNlr6abPT0Sv4AzObLuhjXD62UzvyXRlwyj nJfHuMxJeib9VbMibjOePwc3J5nQ7kSefkpCdbjAAd6QNH2/XEbLRxSds0+9bmWfjD RVzRH2Za/g5G51+DagFn67neH0r18y27ksyAlShGIFYu7cPTg1uQ24DansAkaH5Umb 3WdHeNqOuC7zOh8iCOmCFgOe0PWW6Lq3KfebaD4fEaNzK5jat7ArqeVOuE3upPhaDO AXHAr4HFExe/2JWaX9LfrxmIRcTJ9N3fym1yNFpt2GGp5EMYGkCVGd/0hrjAqvwXhV dLJRoVJmzcbhQ== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F07E441084; Sun, 3 May 2026 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Daniel Pereira Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Pereira Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/pt_BR: process: link maintainer-kvm-x86 in maintainer-handbooks In-Reply-To: <20260428180208.175472-1-danielmaraboo@gmail.com> References: <20260428180208.175472-1-danielmaraboo@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 09:07:11 -0600 Message-ID: <87jytkcz1c.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Daniel Pereira writes: > The Portuguese translation of maintainer-kvm-x86.rst exists in the > directory, but it was not listed in the toctree of > maintainer-handbooks.rst. > > Add the missing entry to ensure the document is properly indexed and > reachable through the main maintainer handbook page. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Pereira > --- > .../translations/pt_BR/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/maintainer-handbook= s.rst b/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst > index ba36df8ee..bf7a38147 100644 > --- a/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst > +++ b/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst > @@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ Conte=C3=BAdos: > maintainer-netdev > maintainer-soc > maintainer-soc-clean-dts > + maintainer-kvm-x86 Weird, I wonder why it doesn't warn about this...? In any case...applied, thanks. jon