From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B2569D06; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707488502; cv=none; b=OkXoojVHUIVsbXF+Eceybx8ESp97b84urdUDSXd6KKSwbzNOVfgpp2rWebGw0wyRbFoFaymP4QOmsGAkIu83K9feIkldaLt4BYNPFZI4lXt24ttr9BPJdEUTa3nfo9yHSBLR3kpZHey+tnuPTEh1l6htQdw79cqKPO5fJa7iZiA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707488502; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ftA9Fo7g2wtjDSzW77/KjG5A162BrIDTYmApgh1fI6Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Je585fxkZN1yWb7DaIQfawW8QAiY8uLR81ucPZy1+tt+89U41QxzRpv0jt/qCEFAbVdlHvY7iCeqGSsmL8RHqAHdEQjwXKx/yqeSPLgt2hfOCEmxNPxhQAtsWE02ZPjYgKIVwm0Qabn33dWKsp0lN7You0wsKCIJMk2UjrGogac= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=F27PHmnY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="F27PHmnY" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 7913B41A2A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1707488498; bh=taW+tkvDfbt2qy8v9nxzh69sp/ior4+xEzMGXz77F5A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=F27PHmnY6ZYKp4xw6+JHAJxKY60h8nYposF4baL+8MM68OwZLKH9BDs20Dt4fnxvx 47IIBUlzutPoBwf2JIdKYVUHcKTY0xu9yYQgkT/pWNhdXa4wjaET5UGgFZIyr7SwAC L6kHybSckxdbNcIcR3kMbUh2sQu5LgtRqCTFMvW4mUGZTwPxRvnbkowOxf+mD/S5nQ aa5k/L1HkT1A/732504ozxXGfy9hh4qE0Acj9wAVqvDOJpu1dO8EzfcPpx62/rH6On tu4NxFpXU3nxPY+DiAld8mByNQa44Zjd9hUnXpQ6H8BK2bnXVevbAW7/aiKBpNggA+ UNwepEWTikRFg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::646]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7913B41A2A; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:21:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Christian Brauner , Vincenzo Mezzela Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: filesystems: fix typo in docs In-Reply-To: <20240209-apathisch-lustig-c2f17bdd74ed@brauner> References: <20240208162032.109184-1-vincenzo.mezzela@gmail.com> <20240209-apathisch-lustig-c2f17bdd74ed@brauner> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 07:21:37 -0700 Message-ID: <87jznden0u.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Christian Brauner writes: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:20:32PM +0100, Vincenzo Mezzela wrote: >> This patch resolves a spelling error in the filesystem documentation. >> >> It is submitted as part of my application to the "Linux Kernel Bug >> Fixing Spring Unpaid 2024" mentorship program of the Linux Kernel >> Foundation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Mezzela >> --- >> Documentation/filesystems/files.rst | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/files.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/files.rst >> index 9e38e4c221ca..eb770f891b27 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/files.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/files.rst >> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ before and after the reference count increment. This pattern can be seen >> in get_file_rcu() and __files_get_rcu(). >> >> In addition, it isn't possible to access or check fields in struct file >> -without first aqcuiring a reference on it under rcu lookup. Not doing >> +without first acquiring a reference on it under rcu lookup. Not doing > > I stared at this for way too long to figure out that there's actually a > spelling mistake in there. Thanks! I've snagged it. Jon, let me know if > you prefer to take it. I'd applied it too - sorry, he sent two and I replied once to the other one, which you didn't get. I can drop my copy. Thanks, jon