From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Daniel Pereira <danielmaraboo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Pereira <danielmaraboo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: pt_BR: Reorganize process/index.rst to follow english structure
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:25:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ldaahwko.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813134741.11025-1-danielmaraboo@gmail.com>
Daniel Pereira <danielmaraboo@gmail.com> writes:
> The main index.rst file for the pt_BR translation was grouping all
> translated process documents directly in its toctree, which frequently
> caused patch collisions among contributors.
>
> Following Jonathan Corbet's suggestion, this patch introduces a new
> pt_BR/process/index.rst that mirrors the subsection structure of the
> English Documentation/process/index.rst. The translated documents are
> now organized into their respective categories, rather than a single
> flat list.
>
> The root pt_BR/index.rst now simply references process/index.
>
> This matches the upstream categorization and significantly reduces
> merge conflicts for future pt_BR translations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Pereira <danielmaraboo@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/translations/pt_BR/index.rst | 27 +----
> .../translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst | 104 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst
OK, this is what I wanted to see. One complaint:
[...]
> diff --git a/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst b/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..5cecc0300
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/translations/pt_BR/process/index.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +.. raw:: latex
> +
> + \renewcommand\thesection*
> + \renewcommand\thesubsection*
> +
> +.. _process_index_pt_BR:
I continue my hopeless quest of trying to convince people not to add
these useless top-of-file labels; all they do is add clutter to the
text.
I have gone ahead and applied the patch so that people working on
translations have the new base to work on for 7.4. But I took out that
label.
(I have doubts about the LaTeX boilerplate too, but left it there).
Thanks,
jon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 13:47 [PATCH] docs: pt_BR: Reorganize process/index.rst to follow english structure Daniel Pereira
2026-08-13 15:25 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ldaahwko.fsf@trenco.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=danielmaraboo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox