From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F4639656D; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 19:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772566071; cv=none; b=F8NNPMIeDLohK1jSPa66WBsHNa/3cL0vj6AppQMNFjI6pPiT2ZCFXLOhx1n3x3Qy3lHwlRl6P51cDc1QrtKyjbwYySJo85SBO4xa23BaoPffGapVj8Z1Jr3g70kja9PlzyzrAyF8jnkyk9aIxJlv9QBq/gmt14XfeeOu/T/h7sQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772566071; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Dsqi1wE3Ym5QNKhtzxtJFt9zUAfqyXOdRITFfxKfo7o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V3OexHPmPTLg9RGPWoDXy5Y2erJ/iNu46LTwPbTN5Pcq3SRhpz2bBCQDeHE0VK9+zPzoWNrwnMhWPBK5XvcD2zIWhSX1k9RV7LM0q726gvVUZFDuhOtpTk4pz1IlBF6TokSYSB92VBeBWNrT0P2wOXAaeALD8b4/lWmIkORdLT0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=MXkg45rK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="MXkg45rK" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 59500411CF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1772566069; bh=CNglGzpcfdJvIrcxYFBRcyIZHbBYDSI52NDm5FAmAGo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=MXkg45rKGiTGlnwpm1dBKiLnGVOAzgnMi+d3g9b+4RMkVgjiTt6Ml0HAU+rAdeAEd b+WPhOW5lQo3uUwrPWtydYFcq/za9Qavah2d0V6+gRM2XLem3mXHPyA++Si4y764NE +FhO1tpgpu+v22gVdOQOxFDzPA6BEHjn5iDommc+wNQoJX1dq62g4/plY/LWioNqpT 5Vw2Mg0tWPDDcBqGdXTOYRI+deQUBIuEMKtcR44wgMGz1ir1nnoTj0gw5sxmkwoO/I HYGQlDLy9tQ/XjwcJTTgVuvQQIHtZ9EYn87Zs5RLygyowigiCiOq7B4Le0CZR43vqe 7lIXYxma8Cu1A== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59500411CF; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 19:27:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Manuel , Collin Funk , Shuah Khan Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] workflow, scripts: sort changes.rst and ver_linux In-Reply-To: <8dec205e406364d14f7ddf3ea11695407a7980b4.camel@airmail.cc> References: <20260302182405.86829-2-manuelebner@airmail.cc> <87wlzsdf3o.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <8dec205e406364d14f7ddf3ea11695407a7980b4.camel@airmail.cc> Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 12:27:48 -0700 Message-ID: <87ldg8af2j.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Manuel writes: >> - Why I'm getting the same series from a completely different identity; >> =C2=A0 the first set came from "Hans Anda" > > I messed this up, let me explain: > I used to keep my real name out of the internet. The last couple days i c= hanged > my mind. I guess it's ok when my real name shows up in git blame. > I really should have added a note about that. sorry. So you sent me patches under a false name? That's ... not the best way to start building trust. >> - Why my request to separate out the logically different changes were >> =C2=A0 ignored. > > I split the patch into a series=C2=A0like i responded on Tue, 24 Feb 2026= 08:13:02=20 >>>i will make a Patch series with the files split. > > Do you want me to send two patches, which are not in a patch series? No, I want you to separate the logical changes. - Sorting the entries in the list is one logical change. - Adding new items is a different one. If you mix it in with the sort, nobody can really see which items are new. See what I'm getting at? jon