From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BB821F8753; Sat, 21 Jun 2025 19:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750534752; cv=none; b=YubxYBUYw4Z9GxDIR2kvJYW0sRyKdj2SxhKgvgZg7SZa94Y4yVoR0yd47L2E9aQmSfBaLBhyCZ+ctL+upi9l8VXgj2KZnDdegZf+wAtIz0aLBT2oSC+yarY9UsblU/+zSE1FNiBPAQOR+++48Jwm5hkaxuxjKvSI2B3Pi0mNoII= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750534752; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3yiVFdTPNAuUz4xvy0quCMpPzcyTEdAaCd8L2MTQ+pw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ek3INxiVfC5kxOZLY8hjLJiWyZwmD3gEW6d9VuWAWF8/S/3Cx+q4iQ+pp7bp/ccC9UgYGcD9NS0zIhz5DXDiXubb5Bho7rc3V9wNkWKB7xha+eAm0Pig79DKXZOwj/FiajqTzKZ3yE9Wy3xqDntRuWcLOn9NtzF6Aic/OwSIIs4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=rIYECFqc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="rIYECFqc" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 8B4AB41AD8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1750534750; bh=3yiVFdTPNAuUz4xvy0quCMpPzcyTEdAaCd8L2MTQ+pw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=rIYECFqcI9E61znUsBSXySGfTlkNf4a90G2leZDRyJG6Tw0PnWxKob+guqA+NoLzo AErGEMLmEF8OnYqkEmnaiemcTjEFs3nYYJnWVi61v729BPhGXzpObiCWXYDJguO4+A wZ/AZXSyqhusPsbr10RQC9cUdnAZv86UN51kZvIEeGI0b9vcpmr7sPEN5uikVNMe4h PF6aJHxCvkI0JvTl2OkjqCwFeR5/LJPoXFrc7M36grz6hQTvftfhpeM4iI7m97xFpz hjPb8KaENddi/ImFXHKRp5BeaXJBoiXBLZCC9xvMQFQvqFfaYgvtrbhc0oQdx2h2LR Dzcf3B3WQc/xw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9:67c:16ff:fe81:5f9b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B4AB41AD8; Sat, 21 Jun 2025 19:39:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Some improvements for the doc build system In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 13:39:09 -0600 Message-ID: <87ldpkdgv6.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > This series contain some patches from my parser-yaml one that > aren't directly related to it. It basically addresses some issues > at the build system. It also adds a script that I wrote with the > purpose of checking backward problems when building against > older toolchains. > > IMO, the best is to merge and apply it before the YAML series. OK, I've applied it, but ... someday, I think the test_doc_build tool should be properly documented and put somewhere under tools/testing. jon