From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6DFC25333A; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740169498; cv=none; b=hro5uVir42wKZ9np7oEQ//icwSsZ9oguXZt4bIi4CEuTfVyAXTKQcSAA68nJbhfi90YFrgkxJ9SBS2vN8SOdKilt9DrXW0IC7MBKmpK9GqppK9S9AMpnuher5PUsS/avDZAx0m26vXV7hcLpt/XNbwSsdcyxVcD+zHkP77/Shxs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740169498; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bevx+wSluSqWoO5l8ljWh/CaoRN1/CG+nKKg9IxZTfQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qWmsFXa3cBkz9VcphM5SA+GN4GMpwyfj4mCwc0Y1kswYcuTUC7OVOdtLoyl6CNi+VE5SMEAYGDirAJ4TdsyaaaEa0t0BZeCRP2gu4edVfiNfoWZthu/QEeCrFkbdfQqs505Y0zoxGF0LymxlGAK9k9sOoqL+HSi7pow4zvNUA1o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=bLIP6W6N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="bLIP6W6N" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net DFFB9404E4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1740169496; bh=80w5SdSbcL18mhDzRH7GeyE4C1Z/Lu7UZLIH+V4NHIk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=bLIP6W6Nex+kMU8HNmUTvRYBLtH6JzgM/e+KbVH9O28PYRa1c3y4vtM+RMMn1TdZ8 DJJophpo19P76/AkTYJDvo2wqU/Qz8raHjygW8jF3Uv1XbLokYbZUQPe6kpt/k0dDe GPuZL0K3hc4asgNNdh68N/QxIlS5ENl1hWC/qy4SF82kWmGKryi15sQOagONSwBmor 2Rl+3UrALuACiQhVRZ4bUdZtV5XmclOL+ADen58uCn9wiF2xt8kouokEYhLd713omM oS0SseCZwPCJ6GGQ6+3gniJ+ZGP4ziQhAwiGA3fWuR8GIc7pxKUQjaUAsmDn/8S0M8 FPAxjB7GR2j1w== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2d7f::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFFB9404E4; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:24:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] additional fixes to kernel-doc.py In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:24:54 -0700 Message-ID: <87msefgi5l.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > This series comes after: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/cover.1739952783.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/T/#t >From the previous discussion, I was thinking that a new version of that series was in the plan, right? Just so I don't lose the plot... Thanks, jon