From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09830382381; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774890003; cv=none; b=YllwSCuXBthu9Yt5kG2WPr/OL8Od4eU/jirB9tvHb1z1yV0djTBMu97fsX8Qg6cd4EYN2uVdy88WBGSqVdOPu5oZ1p8EtWsP573C9W1WpMtx0yQrlevpRB1layXl+1r2bJBsXWKPwEjvuQ8pzgYffa5E02zWk8lYFBPs9pMfdwc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774890003; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2E4z28nhT7FyhJMGu2QGUXqZPc7uR54gBAMKcuXcsnY=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=T5aH4NQTbIoqeeB9MVOqMEsa23Xjq+nv+ixLc6aGdO7kXeN+FCAkfGTSnOFFgV54o0qUjRSCPQYsR2QkVy8ZD+eB0lGsZvk1JSvMpeTQy9UZO/yKQM5kLxhgXM7v/U2aDmLfbNJf0Ryyb6nn8yuQTonZvLr6PTg4CX6zhL0gVy0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=Q50Yayq1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="Q50Yayq1" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 8CD6B41222 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1774890000; bh=drDK5feenNonmJTZCQaLxqlxBj2wLDZDbI19NKYvAuE=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Q50Yayq1y625ELVT6WsktLB/Vi/ZIxp9p/TYWe12Yj7IcSeEkp92/sQ5uE+i6+cHB RR7HU2PA7UOefLFCOoYa/HP3aE7o+YOGpyMxfRfC+dXxff2+EOq5WfBF9UK0pkzr0J I8uZ7u6GrRXJCUKMm9l43EYMHKvddom3DJOXGg+Jem8BgFol3XUNpuFQljlGlXjXY1 5mnEnTUbmW9lBEnvQhuNke/+9OPtnIdgTK+uGTcS6oBgtlttYp4zewOFu2l+2uKoKK 4mNzVSKhurhHMRzvczDPu7z+aezAQWKiweZLkRsn4FB2hUgpJDAktf9jPq3xfeFTOA xXkoE28CZHs0Q== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CD6B41222; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:00:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)" , Randy Dunlap , Shuah Khan , Andrew Morton , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Feng Tang , Pawan Gupta , Dapeng Mi , Kees Cook , Marco Elver , "Paul E . McKenney" , Askar Safin , Bjorn Helgaas , Sohil Mehta , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?562U5aSNOiBb5aSW6YOo6YKu5Lu2XQ==?= Re: [PATCH] docs: kernel-parameters: fix architecture alignment for pt, nopt, and nobypass In-Reply-To: <16386e7715284b22b5f72e7106ed5619@baidu.com> References: <20260326074658.1899-1-lirongqing@baidu.com> <16386e7715284b22b5f72e7106ed5619@baidu.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 10:59:59 -0600 Message-ID: <87pl4lmewg.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)" writes: > You are right , [X86] isn't needed , How about to remove the [X86], like below > > Documentation/kernel-parameters: fix architecture alignment for pt, nopt, and nobypass > > Commit ab0e7f20768a ("Documentation: Merge x86-specific boot options doc > into kernel-parameters.txt") introduced a formatting regression where > architecture tags were placed on separate lines with broken indentation. > This caused the 'nopt' [X86] parameter to appear as if it belonged to > the [PPC/POWERNV] section. Please submit this as properly formatted standalone patch, so it can be applied. Thanks, jon