From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4231F4727; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 16:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728490429; cv=none; b=YdW2uiFmh0o/uNZfJ88wVRCoR8F97UB66bdZSwjjrVSh98sftjdyncJlZeHjORWEXvUO2Nfn1mdOYb4PCEge8NwCkhO0FKHR9/UPZ0W82DPmPV1tqTtdY8ZqwzbW7mwhJXwCaNVM9J8aLZvAmAkrHtyzBxTv6Pk11Q7T9lkYuJU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728490429; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k2AauQCxT5E9o8Og7vMo0KTkdk0cTiSbjAs/VD9in4U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GKAtA6CaRvNizvFcxXdREdD/t1d4CZidFPbTwc1CLgrqKqW8DGQgQgJGLC58XzOP+WAFQT+GgA7gG+0CFpT/SddB8k7TrFQTWuF61xQ3lp7Xvsx8d4fhzuQkdjw4yzgcjds9laAqoSk049DzhYxFifK/jqpR8IjlVhhs1CRbxA0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=CfPzSDFG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="CfPzSDFG" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 5B74F42BFE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1728490422; bh=CDzpyu2oFSqa5srLpZeVEFvn8kV26o/3REyRaSpzS1o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=CfPzSDFGBJruqkA8eajmYJHlOs5R5/st8DkhYhb6TcUudxTeVpRjWM4FzyXQCLwmt n6pPp4BEwJ7yhLhR1tMJx5ngnuxMDjCz6bXdCcXpBhTZjBc7DgkPmX2mWAJjWgGoOS Gjc5PcAHI9Az1V2mVo2g58xmLnyXxHxClXKeWEqyV26IRHjbY572Sen7PDE+1ZdotH O6hgZ2f0HUl/vzesvns4ZqAkPDpf9z4+ntRLv18k4U2mdB9ei7FMdBZAHoFVfEuzPc xKAzUJ6Nkh3bxtg5Z99g9zUaJxAKv3+VMyk9SEdZcwRVJupyAdVMQlqWJixOOr1myU fQiMtJJ3p6fUw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B74F42BFE; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 16:13:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Pengyu Zhang , alexs@kernel.org, siyanteng@loongson.cn, seakeel@gmail.com, si.yanteng@linux.dev Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zpenya1314@gmail.com, yaxin_wang_uestc@163.com, zenghui.yu@linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Docs/zh_CN: Translate page_tables.rst to Simplified Chinese In-Reply-To: <20241008153824.4691-1-zpenya1314@gmail.com> References: <20241008153824.4691-1-zpenya1314@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 10:13:41 -0600 Message-ID: <87plo9b6fe.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Pengyu Zhang writes: > This patch provides a Simplified Chinese translation of the > "page_tables.rst" document, aimed at improving accessibility > for Chinese-speaking developers and users. > > The translation prioritizes technical accuracy and readability, > ensuring that the content remains clear and informative for > its intended audience. > > Signed-off-by: Pengyu Zhang > --- > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/index.rst | 1 + > .../translations/zh_CN/mm/page_tables.rst | 221 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 222 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/page_tables.rst When posting revised versions of patches, please always include (below the "---" line) a summary of what has changed. It looks like Alex reviewed the previous version; is there a reason you didn't include the Reviewed-by tag? Unless something comes up, my plan is to add that back and apply this in the near future. Thanks, jon