linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to clock tai
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:17:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pml3x7mv.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220426175338.3807ca4f@gandalf.local.home>

On Tue, Apr 26 2022 at 17:53, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * ktime_get_tai_fast_ns - NMI safe and fast access to tai clock.
>> + *
>> + * The same limitations as described for ktime_get_boot_fast_ns() apply. The
>> + * mono time and the TAI offset are not read atomically which may yield wrong
>> + * readouts. However, an update of the TAI offset is an rare event e.g., caused
>> + * by settime or adjtimex with an offset. The user of this function has to deal
>> + * with the possibility of wrong timestamps in post processing.
>> + */
>> +u64 notrace ktime_get_tai_fast_ns(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
>> +
>> +	return (ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() + ktime_to_ns(data_race(tk->offs_tai)));
>
> As you are using this for tracing, can you open code the
> ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(), otherwise we need to mark that function as
> notrace.

which we should do anyway....

kernel/trace/trace.c:   { ktime_get_mono_fast_ns,       "mono", 1 },

> Not to mention, this is a fast path and using the noinline of
> __ktime_get_fast_ns() should be less overhead.
>
> That said, I hit this too:
>
>             less-5071    [000] d.h2. 498087876.351330: do_raw_spin_trylock <-_raw_spin_lock
>             less-5071    [000] d.h4. 498087876.351334: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>             less-5071    [000] d.h5. 498087876.351334: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>             less-5071    [000] d.h3. 498087876.351334: rcu_read_lock_sched_held <-lock_acquired
>             less-5071    [000] d.h5. 498087876.351337: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 1651009380.982749: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 1651009380.982749: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h5. 1651009380.982749: rcu_read_lock_held_common <-rcu_read_lock_sched_held
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 498087876.375905: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 498087876.375905: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h5. 498087876.375905: update_cfs_group <-task_tick_fair
>     kworker/u8:1-45      [003] d.h7. 498087876.375909: ktime_get_mono_fast_ns <-ktime_get_tai_fast_ns
>
> The clock seems to be toggling between 1651009380 and 498087876 causing the
> ftrace ring buffer to shutdown (it doesn't allow for time to go backwards).

That does not make sense. offs_tai changes only when clock is set via
adjtimex() or settimeofday().

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-27  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-14  9:18 [PATCH v2 0/3] tracing: Introduce trace clock tai Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-14  9:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to " Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-14 14:59   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-18 17:15     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-26 21:53   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27  8:17     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-04-27  8:38     ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-27 15:27       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 17:22         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 19:23           ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 20:06         ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-27 20:08           ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 20:42         ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-27 21:05           ` Steven Rostedt
2022-04-27 21:12           ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-14  9:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tracing: Introduce trace " Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-14  9:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] tracing: Add documentation for " Kurt Kanzenbach
2022-04-14 11:27   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-04-14 11:38     ` Kurt Kanzenbach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pml3x7mv.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).