From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8445C433E6 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDE560235 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240098AbhCAVyp (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:54:45 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:42658 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235811AbhCAVwp (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:52:45 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC63E2B8; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:51:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net BC63E2B8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1614635505; bh=7QCiNeV/LGx+Kezp++PV+sgJR5/h7g4Lbc34vL/8M5s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=gZ/Kt8NN2Vb1oGoXs3Q0bIixByIlGIlihtkjAUgBcXVLQ2Ewl5HbDG1rWY/CNHhkQ FLLNJdBvha8CxdZCDXVcs8VCqar3+8YZH3SKmMWAvsv4UmajSQpGuCTxRz8SkHpvFa JO5G/CiECqKGJkwHMWuGdywEt6lMURtKiwVDqk5b7igOaozdRwUqEbXct+5DcdZkP4 zr7Tn0ZdnlJtXqAZYToGUjZwqYFEX9UYz4eDhuHfI2a6EUDrbINCwIhKksNjikXjTx 8+ISYgkWcR7POvqPkg71rsmb53fUcRyzlZYO25r29rkhcP+6TlQB8o552yKZCQgOQM icLzFJs8ptgQg== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Aditya Srivastava Cc: yashsri421@gmail.com, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC v3] scripts: kernel-doc: fix typedef support for struct/union parsing In-Reply-To: <20210225145033.11431-1-yashsri421@gmail.com> References: <20210225145033.11431-1-yashsri421@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:51:44 -0700 Message-ID: <87pn0i35lb.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Aditya Srivastava writes: > Currently, there are ~1290 occurrences in 447 files in the kernel tree > 'typedef struct/union' syntax for defining some struct/union. However, > kernel-doc currently does not support that syntax. Of the ~1290 > occurrences, there are four occurrences in ./include/linux/zstd.h with > typedef struct/union syntax and a preceding kernel-doc; all other > occurrences have no preceding kernel-doc. > > Add support for parsing struct/union following this syntax. > > Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava Applied, thanks. jon