From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6DA350272; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705944089; cv=none; b=ap1EZ3EBf6IQR7Gn8tXlfBqMbPnUgjxLXt8eDpQr9XzosMr/LNGdAFtCc0dlaAmtmHPE3rweA0IYOaFHIL2cN8nJCDPidubhKzrHUDoaE2Z2Bg+V3vcLM+mHcxGSXiliVHj1Cq2SLQByBBz1R8IihUyZbvUykk+PIB45tCKPx3A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705944089; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kWQHfwN1yi0ttF4juKCo2E5MXvh0hWGgjbREXz8PJQ8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TxgTSzhuLQ8ctf80W4stJKwFKf8WY+OWOanK1zctt5Lnppewm23L2dDan/PW5mYASNOKq5PdZYU70DHxL7h6famGlS4Yw/saFtCaruecqVPtCL8N2NbL85aN5lHTyCMgSCnbxAHdrtPV6fv6wUgg3Yo6KFOVA+Mb+1dWEsnGK3U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=RsFeWbUb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="RsFeWbUb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1705944088; x=1737480088; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=kWQHfwN1yi0ttF4juKCo2E5MXvh0hWGgjbREXz8PJQ8=; b=RsFeWbUbhNB3At/N0BbsiOWjU6K+2pd0UHKJb/64yWe9qdCm2lkdDbcy ex0ZsBwUetpSl6CNzIznNmjRI1Y03FdDT+P6BhrA83ulHZaw1dsGue/u/ Cn4Zof/T9QR1enh+Hnnn46VCe5ofGetfNLOIMPaJM+Q70ET39sVQzsO6C A1jtHNpVe1AqMZB4GoNFuaGoVTrpllNRx+UpMxvZzoyHGi1ce4j1rg0IC gqbfsU/HDnle1gh+63fnWl+VGhNdZ8nqJM3JOlXvTHvrYtctZLC5Tzk6o dWICnaeWtBHb/UBBK5093pcTj0JEPOLqhmZtQp4iwMWJ7DeXQHI9oPHzb w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10961"; a="22750046" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,211,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="22750046" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jan 2024 09:21:27 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,211,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="27723905" Received: from mshelego-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.40.242]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jan 2024 09:21:22 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation , Linux DRI Development , Linux Intel Graphics Cc: David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Lyude Paul , Imre Deak , Wayne Lin , Maxime Ripard , Ville =?utf-8?B?U3lyasOkbMOk?= , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , Bagas Sanjaya , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Separate @failing_port list in drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mgr() comment In-Reply-To: <20231114081033.27343-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20231114081033.27343-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:21:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87r0i9nv1s.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > Stephen Rothwell reported htmldocs warnings when merging drm-intel > tree: > > Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers:296: drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:5484: ERROR: Unexpected indentation. > Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers:296: drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:5488: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. > > Separate @failing_port return value list by surrounding it with a > blank line to fix above warnings. > > Fixes: 1cd0a5ea427931 ("drm/dp_mst: Factor out a helper to check the atomic state of a topology manager") > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20231114141715.6f435118@canb.auug.org.au/ > Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya Thanks, pushed to drm-misc-fixes. BR, Jani. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > index 0854fe428f173a..b9a98587fbef7f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > @@ -5479,6 +5479,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc); > * - 0 if the new state is valid > * - %-ENOSPC, if the new state is invalid, because of BW limitation > * @failing_port is set to: > + * > * - The non-root port where a BW limit check failed > * with all the ports downstream of @failing_port passing > * the BW limit check. > @@ -5487,6 +5488,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc); > * - %NULL if the BW limit check failed at the root port > * with all the ports downstream of the root port passing > * the BW limit check. > + * > * - %-EINVAL, if the new state is invalid, because the root port has > * too many payloads. > */ > > base-commit: 59be90248b422f2924872de0be2867652214096a -- Jani Nikula, Intel