From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47B0318ED7; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 20:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768337720; cv=none; b=c+IRnjboJgxxkh7spiImpOdLV3Dz/mVeJf+aS+DqxxPViNTFaYYDLq3yYaxULGAqBTPUG8ClZkuL6TlG9xtr1B2g5j9HO9ZSEmnT0mcioybk3swL03uehYWxvHNgOBIj6LB9F758aoXI3NQVp8hyyTQdmvboXpatzT5NrvEfuUE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768337720; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vzmBt0z3ma4hD/j+DxSwzTLyRYqBVqCQiNr/41uZak8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=j5iyNMf+O8RNkxshWa8O98EuwXlAVv8c9BIXjXggnmUkyvFuKHToT8Fb5SUfR3moKYUWidG/eMqRnBAQl1Gm1fGvD9Mj0faxPnVYfl3qD4P37APxW/++PrckJ+Ykhj19Lu9Z49qzgzUcO7GfoM57oDiD/i3fXHw8MuS8V3cwhmo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=UahJVn7v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="UahJVn7v" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net E94BD40C98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1768337719; bh=x1JYO/TQ31Tlov5BDVCdRVsRD+gv/KU3j/7jwQGQk/8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=UahJVn7vVLrbh4cGPer6OxHtixLKYv9nxRDSbQRUD6zF4t20CcZIcs//9URoL4Njq knTfYe9LLBqQ4+7vuFn2zq05fIb3R3xMZwJAn1MtQoCGwHDaGJx9RUPi+AepvcVLw+ z5rmFKlyn0XYB6hlcFHikDtDxFTRflqCLLz8HPQ4syEaBjwOTVnV84RyUlxzQbBatg f65A0BvW8KSc3g/zwBpqSuJhHllsuuvdDKYZCiRLCxoIn/st0E2R7NQt68vI0eeQCV VylMQqhq6428xURmFFKD/FRg/Z2TIkcWMHXIIn9+mnX3fU9x0r1fNfcVLBP8Q1UYVB VLx+ty6k0V/iQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E94BD40C98; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 20:55:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] scripts/kernel-doc: some fixes to kernel-doc comments In-Reply-To: <434e60e7868ef4e001e81e8cfa872dec711ddd34.1768324572.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> References: <434e60e7868ef4e001e81e8cfa872dec711ddd34.1768324572.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 13:55:18 -0700 Message-ID: <87sec9w7ux.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > There are some typos and English errors at the kernel-doc.py comments. > > Locate them with the help of LLM (gpt-oss 14B), locally excecuted > with this prompt: > > review English grammar andsyntax at the comments on the code > below: > > > Not all results are flowers, although it caught several minor > issues there. Add the pertinent fixes, discarding the bad ones. "flowers"? Did the LLM put that out too? :) The changes themselves look fine. Thanks, jon