From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kieran Bingham <kbingham@kernel.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: selftests: test KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:43:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfwfkhk5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <137f2dcc-75d2-9d71-e259-dd66d43ad377@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 11/08/21 14:29, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>> Modify debug_regs test to create a pending interrupt
>> and see that it is blocked when single stepping is done
>> with KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/debug_regs.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> I haven't looked very much at this, but the test fails.
>
Same here,
the test passes on AMD but fails consistently on Intel:
# ./x86_64/debug_regs
==== Test Assertion Failure ====
x86_64/debug_regs.c:179: run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_DEBUG && run->debug.arch.exception == DB_VECTOR && run->debug.arch.pc == target_rip && run->debug.arch.dr6 == target_dr6
pid=13434 tid=13434 errno=0 - Success
1 0x00000000004027c6: main at debug_regs.c:179
2 0x00007f65344cf554: ?? ??:0
3 0x000000000040294a: _start at ??:?
SINGLE_STEP[1]: exit 8 exception 1 rip 0x402a25 (should be 0x402a27) dr6 0xffff4ff0 (should be 0xffff4ff0)
(I know I'm late to the party).
> Paolo
>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/debug_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/debug_regs.c
>> index 6097a8283377..5f078db1bcba 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/debug_regs.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/debug_regs.c
>> @@ -8,12 +8,15 @@
>> #include <string.h>
>> #include "kvm_util.h"
>> #include "processor.h"
>> +#include "apic.h"
>>
>> #define VCPU_ID 0
>>
>> #define DR6_BD (1 << 13)
>> #define DR7_GD (1 << 13)
>>
>> +#define IRQ_VECTOR 0xAA
>> +
>> /* For testing data access debug BP */
>> uint32_t guest_value;
>>
>> @@ -21,6 +24,11 @@ extern unsigned char sw_bp, hw_bp, write_data, ss_start, bd_start;
>>
>> static void guest_code(void)
>> {
>> + /* Create a pending interrupt on current vCPU */
>> + x2apic_enable();
>> + x2apic_write_reg(APIC_ICR, APIC_DEST_SELF | APIC_INT_ASSERT |
>> + APIC_DM_FIXED | IRQ_VECTOR);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Software BP tests.
>> *
>> @@ -38,12 +46,19 @@ static void guest_code(void)
>> "mov %%rax,%0;\n\t write_data:"
>> : "=m" (guest_value) : : "rax");
>>
>> - /* Single step test, covers 2 basic instructions and 2 emulated */
>> + /*
>> + * Single step test, covers 2 basic instructions and 2 emulated
>> + *
>> + * Enable interrupts during the single stepping to see that
>> + * pending interrupt we raised is not handled due to KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ
>> + */
>> asm volatile("ss_start: "
>> + "sti\n\t"
>> "xor %%eax,%%eax\n\t"
>> "cpuid\n\t"
>> "movl $0x1a0,%%ecx\n\t"
>> "rdmsr\n\t"
>> + "cli\n\t"
>> : : : "eax", "ebx", "ecx", "edx");
>>
>> /* DR6.BD test */
>> @@ -72,11 +87,13 @@ int main(void)
>> uint64_t cmd;
>> int i;
>> /* Instruction lengths starting at ss_start */
>> - int ss_size[4] = {
>> + int ss_size[6] = {
>> + 1, /* sti*/
>> 2, /* xor */
>> 2, /* cpuid */
>> 5, /* mov */
>> 2, /* rdmsr */
>> + 1, /* cli */
>> };
>>
>> if (!kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG)) {
>> @@ -154,7 +171,8 @@ int main(void)
>> for (i = 0; i < (sizeof(ss_size) / sizeof(ss_size[0])); i++) {
>> target_rip += ss_size[i];
>> CLEAR_DEBUG();
>> - debug.control = KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP;
>> + debug.control = KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP |
>> + KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ;
>> debug.arch.debugreg[7] = 0x00000400;
>> APPLY_DEBUG();
>> vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
>>
>
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-01 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-11 12:29 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: my debug patch queue Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-11 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: SVM: split svm_handle_invalid_exit Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-11 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-02 16:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-08 14:34 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-08 23:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 12:31 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-09 14:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-09 15:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-08-11 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: SVM: implement force_intercept_exceptions_mask Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-11 14:26 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-02 17:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-08 14:35 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-11 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] scripts/gdb: rework lx-symbols gdb script Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-11 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86: implement KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-11 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: selftests: test KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ Maxim Levitsky
2021-09-06 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-06 21:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-11-01 15:43 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-11-01 16:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-11-01 23:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-02 10:46 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-02 15:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-02 16:18 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-02 18:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-03 9:04 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-08-11 13:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: my debug patch queue Paolo Bonzini
2021-08-11 13:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfwfkhk5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kbingham@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).