From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DFCC4338F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 20:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D4B604DC for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 20:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230393AbhGYUFk (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jul 2021 16:05:40 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:42034 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229518AbhGYUFk (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jul 2021 16:05:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 539FA2E6; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 20:46:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 539FA2E6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1627245970; bh=TuTMn4o7PhW7u5FWUGN7SYgYL59tBjTBrcZFeu3oH+Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=X1Gie8v8uWddy4GjZEb+CqONP79Wj5/xYC8D7ebX7LGL8MXs4KBEDeEGGuMurjiKR 4qQwsDnrRpZKkrxIu4PbsDBL2+E/2GEeeJ7ZQeAn1RY3xFQYTATvIpfkvv+58rW5Mb NUK2iu5PPY7XaCG29fyIHzkYIo7gl/iobP85PrKyFdXl+TqhvO53ZHfhvpontXKfU3 B0Cynnq8q8xcsRnyj+03inf/xk/xtogVY1HWrDuruLFpc8D9+bXPY+hV4xVbEvUGZt idbO7TRpsik2DAXIZE6eqdqPNteRNUyBVFN6Qy4hPEai39vKpUaVf8VTqzn9QuSevC 1BrJTNAl1WqeA== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Hannu Hartikainen , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Joe Perches , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hannu Hartikainen Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: clarify the role of LKML In-Reply-To: <20210707133634.286840-1-hannu@hrtk.in> References: <20210707133634.286840-1-hannu@hrtk.in> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 14:46:09 -0600 Message-ID: <87sg02t94e.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Hannu Hartikainen writes: > The documentation previously stated that LKML should be used as *last > resort*. However, scripts/get_maintainer.pl always suggests it and in a > discussion about changing that[0] it turned out that LKML should in fact > receive all patches. > > Update documentation to make it clear that all patches should be sent to > LKML by default, in addition to any subsystem-specific lists. > > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/19a701a8d5837088aa7d8ba594c228c0e040e747.camel@perches.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Hannu Hartikainen > --- > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. jon