From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE7CA361650; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784241604; cv=none; b=Cn6VdomhUBhd7AA2l9rQlxJhm3or9UbP4Zg8p3qyk4Z/icUzw5YEzSR8DoWj7E+475IxR3E2LC/01Vj/+DuHeXvOXsC+XTahZqKSgJV7d9/GN81k6R1eHFocBP22CxfyEA0uh4QN2XL/4YsPxVRWCC2kPt1Kurt/PSDo6cudIpg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784241604; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1jtFfg52Sz0HtyCsQSpRnWKmKUNqzrl6W++yItm4N2c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Plt8lymO02Mncmq1Qaaw0RdzbwyTSvvJWBu72/y4B/vfK4NT87cxTXtYzLfhdyruB3+DKdD0VSdZRS8mu9azCpwS6ekWpmPFpRBWSMdFr/MMZF48EBxJRXYN10CWZfXD8AgAdXHoQe5coHYNCHHGN1Dc7oXAWk3A/rUo6ExaNAg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=WCwkuSub; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="WCwkuSub" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net F0787408B2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1784241602; bh=iuB3B2RLZz1h/Y9E1kMEcY617JUGpaxS73dqr9cERbQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=WCwkuSubcjdTNeTw7NbdnXyKuIXZJyamwKa/InXk51d4oHWVTTKZV9IxxeKaYfkow fMqKXmWLCFRYHqKB8LIwmvBjo+XBjgE1yp//R2VwcGl3z+nfax7F8eosxKPIuELFpW STYi7cVk2PQr4WjzMG5EAD8q+9XW6DQc+DWdI4SVaacRTbboCg6xcvZqMhEWDdOnnZ gipn15VWoBePneIRnminqrejYCn7/HN4SN/LdyEKy7V6kU8iXerMn/LAsjI+ZEW84c FtQJStaTcr6ETQnl3KGFJFybKt/g0S/Fe9YOTjiRz7R0KtMWiWcC+IPDCCoMsEfu0t rRDcUNqXnJaNQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0787408B2; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:40:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Ryszard Knop , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuicheng Lin , Randy Dunlap , Jani Nikula , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc: Suggest possible names for excess descriptions In-Reply-To: <20260714111208.323108-1-ryszard.knop@intel.com> References: <20260714111208.323108-1-ryszard.knop@intel.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:40:01 -0600 Message-ID: <87tspy5zjy.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Ryszard Knop writes: > Since check_sections() now warns if a documentation tag member name is > the same as defined in the struct, we can suggest names the checker > knows, so that it's more obvious how to deal with the warning. > > Signed-off-by: Ryszard Knop > --- > tools/lib/python/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py | 13 +++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) So I almost applied this version of this patch. For future reference, please: - Post new versions standalone, not as a reply - Do not include version information in the changelog (put it below the "---" line) - Provide a more coherent changelog; the one above does not say what is actually going on here. - CC the maintainer (me). Thanks, jon