From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7B822BEC43; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 15:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775750361; cv=none; b=uWSx7rG54ftNAcKqsdw4zzE9sYvdRIr+gEBfOTaQWVA3tATQNfaA5toay9IJi8o8UWCIuUvoaJ+DpDsjbNlcE28wuHlLrWJcJop7eucVNVIK0Du9qIrIBTYKV/ii/9RMRIVhmdmRH44ncSVQ4RWdlRNr3mCFA4rK6wMjQW/6z+U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775750361; c=relaxed/simple; bh=U9CKN3OU7mysW9YtNEoWjz0fVYEYdpdZw3L+IKx437A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qwqnPC3HYpurNlp18uLEkKv09/FPJLUHCmcyAzdVViqnF1ATryDmnoLHv09FDNHEn9ismxciM5wdrKloxon2DWab199yBwdBtNbkSj4kt/Rb2m88CLsMWPPXaFGPvp2XEjdpmeNTfH7SV+xTXEQetpo50gKDWAdAvaN/5rGg1xU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=mc1EB6Dt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="mc1EB6Dt" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net C365140B2D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1775750358; bh=oqUXX3RHjScrdzQ2jd+6JPTj/DA3k6L/Y3rrpbUINI0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=mc1EB6DtAbrOH0+GWdNAOYljJfIF0YPUAfCz9HJ6WqTLtQFclqe9I4W1JssD23rwv AnQ/JMjX/L6keH1Me9hSTlsP99em8P/xhSG9T/SamoLteLcTbvc1fDnwq11uWG0GoK ic95hUYwF/0645Mmif4lug4JxgbhDo/lixqE0YsoYlwLkOzK9ff0hIEfKPV2f+8FFg bdiEm4F8nPBNQC9tpTZpfobEhtJb9GQaG2TxQbFp2Qp/5xElUpW1QYy68/39VeeFNd yzv2tRDwh2kHtIOEhBaE2l+XBqEnJ+NFU4UPzl9OSPedUEril5Xl1W6M71OpE09FDd QQ4rNHRXfVRDw== Received: from localhost (c-71-229-227-126.hsd1.co.comcast.net [71.229.227.126]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C365140B2D; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 15:59:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Linux Trace Kernel , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tom Zanussi Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Documentation: Update histogram-design.rst for fn() handling In-Reply-To: <20260409115200.45883a07@gandalf.local.home> References: <20260126181742.03e8f0d5@gandalf.local.home> <20260305110347.31d6bae5@gandalf.local.home> <87bjfsb37x.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20260409115200.45883a07@gandalf.local.home> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:59:17 -0600 Message-ID: <87tstk9lbe.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Steven Rostedt writes: > On Thu, 09 Apr 2026 08:47:14 -0600 > Jonathan Corbet wrote: > >> Steven Rostedt writes: >> >> > Hi Jon, >> > >> > Can you take this through your tree? >> >> Somehow it fell through a crack in my inbox, but I have, finally, done >> that. Sorry for the delay. > > Thanks, it has happened to me too often but not as much when I started > using patchwork. Is there a patchwork monitoring linux-doc? If not, I > highly recommend it. I stopped missing almost all patches when I started > managing patches with patchwork. The few times I missed patches was when I > accidentally incorrectly changed the status of a patch. But that's usually > due to my own negligence and not simply because it was lost in my INBOX. No patchwork ... but there is a *massive* pile of stuff that lands on linux-doc that I'm not meant to touch. I think that "b4 review" might be my way forward here. Thanks, jon