From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kunit: Cleanup run_wrapper, fix x-ref
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 06:55:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tu83tyqx.fsf@meer.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABVgOSkybS55KynNvSA-B=2Lemwe-iTOwZ55BO4PwaECokizTw@mail.gmail.com>
David Gow <davidgow@google.com> writes:
> Thanks. The rest of this document is using "we" rather than "you", so
> I used "we'll" for consistency. If "you" is preferred generally, it'd
> be best to change it throughout the document (probably in a separate
> patch).
Nobody has ever tried to articulate a wider policy on first or
second-person usage for kernel docs, so far as I know, and I think
that's just fine. We have far bigger things to worry about before we
get concerned about consistency at that level.
Thanks,
jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-29 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-26 10:15 [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: Cleanup run_wrapper, fix x-ref David Gow
2022-06-28 0:44 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-06-29 4:06 ` [PATCH v2] " David Gow
2022-06-29 8:44 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-06-29 9:05 ` David Gow
2022-06-29 12:55 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2022-07-06 18:40 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tu83tyqx.fsf@meer.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).