From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: python: abi_regex: catch the right exception for a bad regex
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 08:42:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v79mkn59.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anUotMOFSJpBTtJh@aschofie-mobl2.lan>
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 12:03:44AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
>> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>> - [Medium] The patch replaces `re.PatternError` with `re.error` rather than catching both, directly contradicting the commit message and exposing a misunderstanding of standard Python.
>
> It does indeed catch both by simply using 're.error'.
>
> re.PatternError is not a separate exception because re.error was
> kept as an alias for backward compatibility.
>
> So yes, a bit of secret sauce not obvious in the commit message.
>
> I'll wait a bit and see if Maintainers want a respin with a commit
> log update for that.
[Almost missed this - said maintainers respond more reliably when copied
on the emails].
Explaining that you're catching the superclass error would have been
better, certainly. Respin if you like but, in this case, I'm not sure
it's worth the trouble.
Thanks,
jon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 23:49 [PATCH 1/2] docs: python: abi_regex: catch the right exception for a bad regex Alison Schofield
2026-08-06 23:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] docs: python: abi_regex: convert adjacent index placeholders Alison Schofield
[not found] ` <20260807000345.86D851F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-08-07 0:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] docs: python: abi_regex: catch the right exception for a bad regex Alison Schofield
2026-08-07 14:42 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v79mkn59.fsf@trenco.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox