From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39FCC3101D4 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777363014; cv=none; b=b469cygClCzROh9ZJh9ZXjrYuDnRYDK3xLMbE38CbYl5aPzjnInXVAOU/a7H7V1jcolwW78FuUyK0T0XBPghnen5A/035H53OthERuFHeZ0Rp9Z0BvpjqKwZtVH7xvHR6nMRgyDg7yz4m/wopvkA5KSiI+iPC6FOaHlmGk9NWe4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777363014; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zmPPipIm+6cvKey1X/BfUOrTJ48Xi+8NNi1kXYdMK9g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oW6zX9k+9SiVqKX4wOw7OUVlytf3Kj/cU6C3pJDeSTaDW2NO7PnMtcvO0kClBUbfREorzNDfh+aSIUsRDpM/tY6aOO41wR5rGhBd7k8fc4LQVxPYgxDJYrN3x3VoWJjr3vhSFLYNAZeAnPexCi3VNolQczBTjDs5M5YLcRwGpR0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=1kA44cfy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="1kA44cfy" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A29F4E42B5F; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33528601D0; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id D090A10728487; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:56:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1777362999; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=zmPPipIm+6cvKey1X/BfUOrTJ48Xi+8NNi1kXYdMK9g=; b=1kA44cfyy2gAqoFZaCFLU5/x4mwJmrpX9NnolxKVP6VTuS7lhG8uvn4xmMMpXjIV/WNn/L Rj2kVMG5LJl/l3WtmVMnjJCPe4UtzG1M5RnVYuCPczMNL/OPdxB91HcyWcqaFATKIfT1cs 5LAqTuj2K9NNv7oOpvgHyHBBKyQWKsNSQ8fVQohGOsiIM90eQKTHeRvOjjy8yWCG73nvjx 5Gj4hF1bvPI4oqfjCOmG0KMQ+pL57wxklAmmRy7VHBgOd3wDAKC8uvQUaEX0DyfJPvYogk zZhvzoq5w4x8ifzGJJKTnNmlTkWY9ljyELJewso789/KhyKKC8aOCdreYrc/UQ== From: Miquel Raynal To: Pratyush Yadav Cc: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/27] mtd: spi-nor: debugfs: Add locking support In-Reply-To: <2vxz7bps5qoi.fsf@kernel.org> (Pratyush Yadav's message of "Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:11:25 +0200") References: <20260403-winbond-v6-18-rc1-spi-nor-swp-v4-0-833dab5e7288@bootlin.com> <20260403-winbond-v6-18-rc1-spi-nor-swp-v4-17-833dab5e7288@bootlin.com> <87h5owh69c.fsf@bootlin.com> <2vxz7bps5qoi.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 30.2 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:56:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87v7dbecwb.fsf@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hello Pratyush, >> I don't want to be too pushy but this series has been pending for a >> while, there are real fixes inside, it (IMO) greatly improve the >> documentation, adds a testing procedure, gives a friendly interface to >> understand what is locked, etc. I am working on clarifying and improving >> the Winbond vendor driver even more now and I need these changes to get >> in for the cleanup to continue. Can someone bump spi-nor/next on top of >> v7.1-rc1 and apply this? Unless there are more changes, of course. > > Yeah, my bad on this. I think a good part of this series should have > landed in the previous merge window. I was waiting to collect some > reviews on this before applying and didn't realize many patches already > had some. No problem ;) > Anyway, the series overall looks pretty good, although I didn't spend > time looking too closely. Will apply some time this week. Thanks for the > cleanup, it is much appreciated. Perfect! I'm looking into doing more cleanup. Thanks a lot! Cheers, Miqu=C3=A8l