Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fix spelling error in remoteproc.rst

Mathieu Poirier
2024-10-09T15:54:07Z

Good morning,

This is a case of old english vs. new english. Using "implementors" is still
correct. Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the
kernel tree. Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not move
forward with this patch.

Thanks,
Mathieu

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:15:57AM -0600, Everest K.C. wrote:
> Following spelling error reported by codespell
> was fixed:
> implementors ==> implementers
>
> Signed-off-by: Everest K.C. <everestkc@everestkc.com.np>
> ---
> Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
> index 348ee7e508ac..5c226fa076d6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Typical usage
> rproc_shutdown(my_rproc);
> }
>
> -API for implementors
> +API for implementers
> ====================
>
> ::
> --
> 2.43.0
>