From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63133644C1; Sun, 22 Mar 2026 21:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774214746; cv=none; b=Bzns604LbYpSFu5xTNiNcNctUqkkDzIYUHomXwzoFrwlrMwkwcVZIs8nTl0obKoTp8UWfs8QRe1UcMXloQxdAbN570Fz7kVp22Lzr1M9LCGinos0SLwk2I/oKU22Gu81mJAluqsk3l83NQIeXJKB7cgrjCqtUuQNVf1SB4jEy18= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774214746; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sLzZwqlgIyIewuma8u6FvE4MBBCLnIib9IormRqucxo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hvZuC3he6Xuk+O0E2LO0c+nEeswQkptal1dNKM4RtrwgPF7HwKwJqTLUAWuiWXdNtHSTJE48ueFtn0nT2S5plKmbg+nQLA9db6kLY5KHPUJ077Q384SB5WzwrbcY6MjAZt9/Ygea66MOecwE8TwsGs504aQUtJfGxzVL9GPoVt4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=GRPdBir0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="GRPdBir0" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 2846C411EA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1774214745; bh=VN0HovmkbKOOtza+Hn4S6PjAcvyHLvcaFjoiB2Ew/30=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=GRPdBir0mIhwM8QN5GPdJs0DjoEy5vsCuAizP3aPLh3+ES5U1kIhWXQ3YQyidIbcS wQrb0yLfbUP5TorCYzQh69pe9HTf3usaJimWfvio7jXjT0Y4T0tdm4pntYNuc176hu zGFofdXbuXW4JnpgmQQrlAz+FZh5y7WOzWL/rs/3ukbFznD10WbPINFl5ha2a/zMa4 0oQX43/xcSWXHMVlv94ukaBgFD1GTUfSVqAgDPref7JD1geiNupelcnJ+kUWodYq/o o0z2uZnECkXsWrEv9D6s71uF4zR6pQtMcOxXqGljqEiMAYH5YNh6ctPIUo7njAJKYE 9Tf7AW0TWj58Q== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2846C411EA; Sun, 22 Mar 2026 21:25:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aleksandr Loktionov , Randy Dunlap , Shuah Khan , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] More kernel-doc patches In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 15:25:44 -0600 Message-ID: <87wlz3blpj.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > This series comes after: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/cover.1773770483.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/ > > It basically contains patches I submitted before on a 40+ patch series, > but were less relevant, plus a couple of other minor fixes: > > - patch 1 improves one of the CTokenizer unit test, fixing some > potential issues on it; > - patches 2 and 3 contain some improvement/fixes for Sphinx > Python autodoc extension. They basically document c_lex.py; > > - The remaining patches: > - create a new class for kernel-doc config; > - fix some internal representations of KdocItem; > - add unit tests for KernelDoc() parser class; > - add support to output KdocItem in YAML, which is a > machine-readable output for all documented kAPI. > > None of the patches should affect man or html output. OK, I applied this set too. Thanks, jon