From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: kernel_include.py: Cope with docutils 0.21
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 10:01:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmoc6w5a.fsf@meer.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <faf5fa45-2a9d-4573-9d2e-3930bdc1ed65@gmail.com>
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> writes:
> Running "make htmldocs" on a newly installed Sphinx 7.3.7 ends up in
> a build error:
>
> Sphinx parallel build error:
> AttributeError: module 'docutils.nodes' has no attribute 'reprunicode'
>
> docutils 0.21 has removed nodes.reprunicode, quote from release note [1]:
>
> * Removed objects:
>
> docutils.nodes.reprunicode, docutils.nodes.ensure_str()
> Python 2 compatibility hacks
>
> Sphinx 7.3.0 supports docutils 0.21 [2]:
>
> kernel_include.py, whose origin is misc.py of docutils, uses reprunicode.
>
> Upstream docutils removed the offending line from the corresponding file
> (docutils/docutils/parsers/rst/directives/misc.py) in January 2022.
> Quoting the changelog [3]:
>
> Deprecate `nodes.reprunicode` and `nodes.ensure_str()`.
>
> Drop uses of the deprecated constructs (not required with Python 3).
>
> Do the same for kernel_include.py.
>
> Tested against:
> - Sphinx 2.4.5 (docutils 0.17.1)
> - Sphinx 3.4.3 (docutils 0.17.1)
> - Sphinx 5.3.0 (docutils 0.18.1)
> - Sphinx 6.2.1 (docutils 0.19)
> - Sphinx 7.2.6 (docutils 0.20.1)
> - Sphinx 7.3.7 (docutils 0.21.2)
>
> Link: http://www.docutils.org/RELEASE-NOTES.html#release-0-21-2024-04-09 [1]
> Link: https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/changes.html#release-7-3-0-released-apr-16-2024 [2]
> Link: https://github.com/docutils/docutils/commit/c8471ce47a24 [3]
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py
> index abe768088377..638762442336 100755
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py
> @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ class KernelInclude(Include):
> # HINT: this is the only line I had to change / commented out:
> #path = utils.relative_path(None, path)
>
> - path = nodes.reprunicode(path)
> encoding = self.options.get(
Applied, thanks.
jon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-02 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-01 3:16 [PATCH] docs: kernel_include.py: Cope with docutils 0.21 Akira Yokosawa
2024-05-01 7:49 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-05-02 14:46 ` Akira Yokosawa
2024-05-02 14:52 ` Jonathan Corbet
2024-05-02 16:01 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wmoc6w5a.fsf@meer.lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox