From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 484344398EE; Mon, 7 Sep 2026 16:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788798996; cv=none; b=P44QJHXRJ64cx2227IX/OatpHgaV7M6cMxrqiuFrZphMaXzTyHzMJLUKWgORuKd9uG0rc9Gyr7GKuEcNwLoQMh24XG3Gj8ntlM6LuyOVciKoPnkBc9ddX/LrFyMsP6yifW/99ZRopAEltsAlaqzNQFM45zmBsNCdOXlju2LV9c0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788798996; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oteqqPv9DuH1JXd6mdohItpzrDv3KXUeNpa+QuJgaek=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EM9RJrXVpV9v+SFs5wzZtGHox1vLQMT1YNyEUv2FtDPbdQhCbwUFpNv3uKkIfhublIpBTLhB/Ldt/+KW/2nCBs2rpqW5kGYlbAQrDhOOeeiiYxyCBgpjq4REMkqiddufkdm5hlaksCRvwuuyRZq0cf12v8gaHEJQvkG0326fUvc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=Yg44DkR8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="Yg44DkR8" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 4602A408FF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1788798994; bh=OCizvl5QZ2uwcL1hN5gzlvEKTi9TSSVI3/8FfhrlEEU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Yg44DkR8fkqJX3epwFBwnD5BhRfOlqEtWYHqYSEOil+rYQozLfHVG+e4NN3NFMl2v 205QnouX0B+8Qzt1seU1Hpn6zLcJfYFPcEQmUv4A7YGCKschN6ecWP4ojoypZb6p75 twWb7lI91gWrq5PQDCmeoOn9BnwQoZvUMlgpvb55Le0nXqr2jJhTm6n3wEWTVes/+2 ECv0rRDXisIYBybLYAqvFxaV7rHtFbkRuhvgBW8rdFNE1eVrofujqu5IGc0KDrb2xz OpgKDdjrwuLdx0ZqXon8Mpcyvpfx70JvxN1moaVuxEZp5M1ogLGtQDttJJuCvBhX9v BqY3bOST1h6KA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:814::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4602A408FF; Mon, 7 Sep 2026 16:36:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Karl Mehltretter Cc: Karl Mehltretter , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , Pierre Ossman , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: core-api: Fix the ISA DMA example In-Reply-To: <20260905022310.82529-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> References: <20260905022310.82529-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 10:36:33 -0600 Message-ID: <87y0ddow6m.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Karl Mehltretter writes: > The example never matched the ISA DMA API: the functions are named > enable_dma(), disable_dma() and get_dma_residue(), clear_dma_ff() takes > the channel number, and claim_dma_lock() returns an unsigned long. > > Fixes: ddb99f3d35b1 ("[PATCH] ISA DMA API documentation") > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter > --- > Documentation/core-api/dma-isa-lpc.rst | 11 ++++++----- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied, thanks (not that I think people are paying much attention to ISA DMA these days). jon