Re: [PATCH] Documentation: seq_file: drop 2.6 reference

[Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>]

Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> writes:

> Even kernels after 2.6 have seq-file support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>
> See, somebody still reads it :)
>
>  Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.rst
> index 1e1713d00010..d753d8177bcb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.rst
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ position within the virtual file - that position is, likely as not, in the
>  middle of a line of output. The kernel has traditionally had a number of
>  implementations that got this wrong.
>  
> -The 2.6 kernel contains a set of functions (implemented by Alexander Viro)
> +The kernel now contains a set of functions (implemented by Alexander Viro)
>  which are designed to make it easy for virtual file creators to get it

But but but ... it *is* correct as written... :)

(Applied, thanks).

jon