From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CCA32DCC1C; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773760121; cv=none; b=oHpuiGvHpz00mRlbHOihLfIUSwSNXdIdSXCIxxj6zwrPbo+6bMEZzrshHVrJwZIe5Z7NUkhPJ0jciMT53FhsBrlqLHb21o4/DYM2a7Y2Efc/+TkugJnIeY8Vlhpx2ViGw5UPuqWR4xZzCHiUfTm9lLDUmJOX4G0736s+Tj4YtCY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773760121; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VFoALqe8rtJCDOkT4+H1O72SLy/sjIzsK4vg18Yt1Mc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KngLZNRGffhCnXjO0MY76GjHyLwiWZVs51+8lVqSgGIongwjKVnVo2rOS47XsIY3gpjWMzAxs66KzuhtuppS3/hUYsiAI8N2cBFriUI5XiDfY1efmGHJByHLmkafBUg30s3e16V87+Z07vvmLglezNm4o/9Drq6x72QhSyDWVGM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=XJFgT1yr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="XJFgT1yr" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net BC9F540C7C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1773760119; bh=8vYKfYBoiRGStpn90uHCaibqaDnfD6D3sJs+W1L1KSQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=XJFgT1yrcmo4VEKMVJAvQggVD2E+NWmkisMgpPbG2rTtGvp37ssnqKOE25ENl8MnN U48Sjk8c1or7M1D6W/ysBMT6PMIrAdwE+QxyERHcutUtMox0Zn71VZ8+DTVHlQ85bP UsHGjhO660dGRyqJ4PzxJqYwPx8v5lS8USkqL71Oj20bPMzc+xR1pFGx806czzGwTH 4E5QfdE7KlhsRXw9knf456U0b6LUa1bMNmMKBNXhprGKojb/zQ4N0fXu7c78rip+y8 g91qu4TV1onSNweAMAjziotcxYSWZCkABMjAYXi9UYKri8RSs1WPjoDgkHMvLUT6L8 42sFVbmyPPGXw== Received: from localhost (c-71-229-227-126.hsd1.co.comcast.net [71.229.227.126]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC9F540C7C; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:08:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Manuel Ebner , Collin Funk , Shuah Khan Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manuel Ebner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] workflow, scripts: sort changes.rst and ver_linux In-Reply-To: <20260311164935.183495-3-manuelebner@airmail.cc> References: <20260311164935.183495-3-manuelebner@airmail.cc> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:08:38 -0600 Message-ID: <87zf46biix.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Manuel Ebner writes: > It is a pain in the ass to compare the software versions on the running > system (scripts/ver_linux) with the minimal required versions (changes.rst). > Sorting both lists the same way makes side-by-side comparisons a simple task. As noted in the individual patches, we're getting closer, but not quite there yet. Also, overall, I am still not thrilled about you having send me patches under a false name. I need you to, at a bare minimum, acknowledge that this was a violation of the trust that the kernel project depends on, and that the current name you are using is the real one. Thanks, jon