From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E847D2EF for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 19:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727803AbfE1TY1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 15:24:27 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:57122 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727103AbfE1TY1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 15:24:27 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4SJOHiI050326 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 15:24:25 -0400 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ss8r56fjx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 15:24:17 -0400 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 28 May 2019 20:23:30 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.26) by e12.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.199) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 28 May 2019 20:23:25 +0100 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4SJNOSg34275810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 May 2019 19:23:24 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59697AE05C; Tue, 28 May 2019 19:23:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF17AE060; Tue, 28 May 2019 19:23:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain (unknown [9.85.218.160]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 28 May 2019 19:23:20 +0000 (GMT) References: <20190418035120.2354-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190418035120.2354-10-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <1557442868.10635.87.camel@linux.ibm.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.2 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Mimi Zohar Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Kasatkin , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , David Howells , David Woodhouse , Jessica Yu , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , "AKASHI\, Takahiro" Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/12] ima: Implement support for module-style appended signatures In-reply-to: <1557442868.10635.87.camel@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 16:23:16 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19052819-0060-0000-0000-00000348F66C X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011176; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01209920; UDB=6.00635634; IPR=6.00990949; MB=3.00027089; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-05-28 19:23:29 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19052819-0061-0000-0000-000049888DD2 Message-Id: <87zhn65qor.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-28_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905280121 Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Mimi Zohar writes: > Hi Thiago, > >> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >> index fca7a3f23321..a7a20a8c15c1 100644 >> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c >> @@ -1144,6 +1144,12 @@ void ima_delete_rules(void) >> } >> } >> >> +#define __ima_hook_stringify(str) (#str), >> + >> +const char *const func_tokens[] = { >> + __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_stringify) >> +}; >> + >> #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY >> enum { >> mask_exec = 0, mask_write, mask_read, mask_append >> @@ -1156,12 +1162,6 @@ static const char *const mask_tokens[] = { >> "MAY_APPEND" >> }; >> >> -#define __ima_hook_stringify(str) (#str), >> - >> -static const char *const func_tokens[] = { >> - __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_stringify) >> -}; >> - >> void *ima_policy_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) >> { >> loff_t l = *pos; > > Is moving this something left over from previous versions or there is > a need for this change? Well, it's not a strong need, but it's still relevant in the current version. I use func_tokens in ima_read_modsig() in order to be able to mention the hook name in mod_check_sig()'s error message: In ima_read_modsig(): rc = mod_check_sig(sig, buf_len, func_tokens[func]); And in mod_check_sig(): pr_err("%s: Module is not signed with expected PKCS#7 message\n", name); If you think it's not worth it to expose func_tokens, I can make ima_read_modsig() pass a more generic const string such as "IMA modsig" for example. > Other than this, the patch looks good. Nice! -- Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center