From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B347D071 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389211AbeG0WpZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:45:25 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:48658 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389659AbeG0WpY (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:45:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3846B40216FB; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.remote.csb (dhcp-17-175.bos.redhat.com [10.18.17.175]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD55E2026D6D; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/9] cpuset: Expose cpus.effective and mems.effective on cgroup v2 root From: Waiman Long To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Ingo Molnar , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin , Juri Lelli , Patrick Bellasi References: <20180719135224.GE2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1107494a-9667-df58-dcac-9366e969dc3a@redhat.com> <20180719153045.GT72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20180719165201.GU72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20180720113121.GJ2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180720114549.GY72677@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20180720154454.GR2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180720155613.GB1934745@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <4857a9db-ebf5-24f8-c42d-d795f5c75854@redhat.com> <20180720163712.GU2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <8c655adc-6d9e-b767-1024-5d6941c995a9@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: <8a671f47-ff1d-b470-987f-0b38badc21cb@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:21:37 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8c655adc-6d9e-b767-1024-5d6941c995a9@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:21:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:21:41 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.4' DOMAIN:'int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'longman@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On 07/20/2018 01:09 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > On 07/20/2018 12:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:19:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>> I am not against the idea of making it hierarchical eventually. I am >>> just hoping to get thing going by merging the patchset in its current >>> form and then we can make it hierarchical in a followup patch. >> Where's the rush? Why can't we do this right in one go? > For me, the rush comes from RHEL8 as it is a goal to have a fully > functioning cgroup v2 in that release. > > I also believe that most of the use cases of partition can be satisfied > with partitions at the first level children. Getting hierarchical > partition right may drag on for half a year, maybe, giving our history > with cpu v2 controller. No matter what we do to enable hierarchical > partition in the future, the current model of using a partition flag is > intuitive enough that it won't be changed at least for the first level > children. Peter, are you OK that or do you still want to have hierarchical partition done before submission? Thanks, Longman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html