From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CBEC48124B; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 13:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782999710; cv=none; b=mSlEow6dYR8M4w2xcPEuMpwowt2ALB6Xxfy0hAlNW3fsCYWJfhtMFr/f+fpz6w8Q/2TGaYtARTsjTiGb1t0m8oin2PSR0G3A/l96ZVwT6t7nsHiUl76ax12Y6T/6/Qhcs+Wb+NytXtuGKKabMq5cHLwgw+jnRrXpjb41ySrPzH8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782999710; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r5yzlfbgXzs3tjCuy6akoWLqe95kXZ37o1Hv5WdsxVE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=F28+2wLDEfq7oUPCymTo2oYnczP5d+0eOyIfBHbFOEf3Pnsih17HiaDQZid1QtxMOOnKfbIxUhG3TTNKALkNs9c2p+nMNAPf+AG4IqsuPWp7HZX2Vm7yVG2YIWFg+URRZ2DWZkREEsJA2EICnJMDbHsD5BU5WOeYZZ6ae22w8+M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=UTLHgdM7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="UTLHgdM7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1782999710; x=1814535710; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=r5yzlfbgXzs3tjCuy6akoWLqe95kXZ37o1Hv5WdsxVE=; b=UTLHgdM7WD75yFchKWWAL1lYhG4c/PjdF++t7FRPjmMPcWqfdVb2rjpC itPCYbecbNTy91VBn6Od5nMuiQT8KPx+KnJnCpzO/YUwmO9myWuZNzBNm VFBTWwEB8aj/4xXTHU0LSCBqkgJL3/7eSNC5kIw80lZRovwkxxdSwyk6g 48cVy2f7AcbFLThqivV/imJijBQ3xHZ1mywivHnfIeMmnbi/g16eMHhci 1tTYmusw3zz29KtFUwDH8B92PaNzw22ieHruezh1Y7L93mRClbM2gYf0F SvAEsB5QWZ3kBouYDVq1KWltTbILAM4KV8XRkk+PuVAThlXEhT9WZchYS Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WDtptg/RScWKf+Qpxy+Ukg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yGiGrT0fSAaphQmfmPvsLw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11835"; a="101178285" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,143,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="101178285" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2026 06:41:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FHlkyB+MTMGrAWNEHZrqIQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: jK4m25SURhSW9ph8wdY9NA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,143,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="256770784" Received: from hrotuna-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.26]) by orviesa004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jul 2026 06:41:45 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Lorenzo Stoakes , "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: Christian Brauner , Linus Torvalds , Jonathan Corbet , Jens Axboe , Jeff Layton , Vlastimil Babka , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] coding-assistants: simplify attribution In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo, Finland References: <20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@kernel.org> <5e7b9d23-4291-48fb-bdc6-47db82d33c80@kernel.org> <20260702-seekrank-stilrichtung-mitentscheiden-69a64ee097ec@brauner> <1f29f48d-b9ff-4de2-a392-dc05781728be@kernel.org> <54d3a698-a275-488e-ad36-ef423db30f70@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:41:40 +0300 Message-ID: <8aa9788c9fc0fc02e2493b3f910437d613506125@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 02 Jul 2026, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > "Say how much of your patch is LLM written, here are some examples". I think the question is, did you offload understanding to the LLM, or just the creation of the patch. I think Assisted-by gets used as an indication of "the contributor might not understand the contribution", and the patch might warrant extra scrutiny. But that's not reliable by any means. Right or wrong, it used to be that the lack of polish in a patch was used as a poor proxy for that, but now we get polished patches from LLMs. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel