From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <paulmck@kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
<rdunlap@infradead.org>, <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
<songmuchun@bytedance.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<jpoimboe@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<chang.seok.bae@intel.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
<jmattson@google.com>, <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
<sandipan.das@amd.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
<james.morse@arm.com>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
<eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/12] x86/resctrl: Introduce data structure to support monitor configuration
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:45:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cb913f4-feee-de7d-60d0-055e234c6501@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166604560666.5345.17936133716540279017.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu>
Hi Babu,
On 10/17/2022 3:26 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> Add a new field in mon_evt to support Bandwidth Monitoring Event
> Configuration(BMEC) and also update the "mon_features" display.
>
> The sysfs file "mon_features" will display the monitor configuration
> if supported.
>
> Before the change.
> $cat /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mon_features
> llc_occupancy
> mbm_total_bytes
> mbm_local_bytes
>
> After the change if BMEC is supported.
> $cat /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mon_features
> llc_occupancy
> mbm_total_bytes
> mbm_total_config
> mbm_local_bytes
> mbm_local_config
This does not seem to be what the code in this patch does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 4 +++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 7 ++++++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 5 ++++-
> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index d79f494a4e91..46813b1c50c2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -814,6 +814,7 @@ static __init bool get_rdt_alloc_resources(void)
> static __init bool get_rdt_mon_resources(void)
> {
> struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
> + bool mon_configurable = rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_BMEC);
>
> if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC))
> rdt_mon_features |= (1 << QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID);
> @@ -825,7 +826,7 @@ static __init bool get_rdt_mon_resources(void)
> if (!rdt_mon_features)
> return false;
>
> - return !rdt_get_mon_l3_config(r);
> + return !rdt_get_mon_l3_config(r, mon_configurable);
> }
This seems to do a portion of configuration in the calling function, pass the
results of to the actual configuration function where the rest of the configuration is
done. Determining "mon_configurable" really looks like it belongs in
rdt_get_mon_l3_config(). Is it availability of rdt_cpu_has() that prevented
that change? Why not make it available internally to all resctrl code?
Patch 7's mbm_config_rftype_init() can also be moved to rdt_get_mon_l3_config()
to match how other related configs (thread_throttle_mode_init()) are done.
>
> static __init void __check_quirks_intel(void)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 16e3c6e03c79..b458f768f30c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -63,11 +63,13 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(rdt_mon_enable_key);
> * struct mon_evt - Entry in the event list of a resource
> * @evtid: event id
> * @name: name of the event
> + * @configurable: true if the event is configurable
> * @list: entry in &rdt_resource->evt_list
> */
> struct mon_evt {
> enum resctrl_event_id evtid;
> char *name;
> + bool configurable;
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> @@ -522,7 +524,7 @@ int closids_supported(void);
> void closid_free(int closid);
> int alloc_rmid(void);
> void free_rmid(u32 rmid);
> -int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r);
> +int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r, bool configurable);
> void mon_event_count(void *info);
> int rdtgroup_mondata_show(struct seq_file *m, void *arg);
> void mon_event_read(struct rmid_read *rr, struct rdt_resource *r,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index efe0c30d3a12..4b8adb7f1c5c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static void l3_mon_evt_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
> list_add_tail(&mbm_local_event.list, &r->evt_list);
> }
>
> -int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r, bool configurable)
> {
> unsigned int mbm_offset = boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_mbm_width_offset;
> struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(r);
> @@ -783,6 +783,11 @@ int rdt_get_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + if (configurable) {
> + mbm_total_event.configurable = true;
> + mbm_local_event.configurable = true;
> + }
> +
> l3_mon_evt_init(r);
>
> r->mon_capable = true;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 1271fd1ae2f3..5f0ef1bf4c78 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -1001,8 +1001,11 @@ static int rdt_mon_features_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> struct rdt_resource *r = of->kn->parent->priv;
> struct mon_evt *mevt;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(mevt, &r->evt_list, list)
> + list_for_each_entry(mevt, &r->evt_list, list) {
> seq_printf(seq, "%s\n", mevt->name);
> + if (mevt->configurable)
> + seq_printf(seq, "%s_config\n", mevt->name);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
If mevt->name is "mbm_total_bytes", then would this not
print "mbm_total_bytes_config"? This is different from "mbm_total_config"
in the changelog and does not match the actual files created in later
patches..
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 22:25 [PATCH v7 00/12] x86/resctrl: Support for AMD QoS new features Babu Moger
2022-10-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] x86/cpufeatures: Add Slow Memory Bandwidth Allocation feature flag Babu Moger
2022-10-27 18:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-27 19:17 ` Moger, Babu
2022-10-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] x86/resctrl: Add a new resource type RDT_RESOURCE_SMBA Babu Moger
2022-10-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring Event Configuration feature flag Babu Moger
2022-10-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] x86/resctrl: Include new features in command line options Babu Moger
2022-10-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] x86/resctrl: Detect and configure Slow Memory Bandwidth allocation Babu Moger
2022-10-25 23:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-26 19:07 ` Moger, Babu
2022-10-26 20:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-27 15:30 ` Moger, Babu
2022-10-27 18:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-28 15:16 ` Moger, Babu
2022-10-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] x86/resctrl: Introduce data structure to support monitor configuration Babu Moger
2022-10-25 23:45 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2022-10-26 19:25 ` Moger, Babu
2022-10-17 22:26 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to read mbm_total_bytes event configuration Babu Moger
2022-10-25 23:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-26 19:36 ` Moger, Babu
2022-10-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to read mbm_local_bytes " Babu Moger
2022-10-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to write mbm_total_bytes " Babu Moger
2022-10-25 23:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-26 19:52 ` Moger, Babu
2022-10-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] x86/resctrl: Add sysfs interface to write mbm_local_bytes " Babu Moger
2022-10-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] x86/resctrl: Replace smp_call_function_many() with on_each_cpu_mask() Babu Moger
2022-10-17 22:27 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] Documentation/x86: Update resctrl.rst for new features Babu Moger
2022-10-18 3:24 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-10-25 23:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-10-26 20:00 ` Moger, Babu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8cb913f4-feee-de7d-60d0-055e234c6501@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox