From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B04BC3F2D2 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA6A20848 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="FYcQwAuX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725948AbgCERst (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:48:49 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:59762 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725938AbgCERst (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:48:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Df+Ig0PmkHN63sTvEob8OOMDLzhpt9pB/wVBSuAD08A=; b=FYcQwAuXpfAk4AjiPu8FznYBor IxyzqmH5D44FR8ZLhaDF/85SOnKAqv1Hh5leH1eFRZ276OIFQtX3upoMz/ISSD9x2I1TJqbYsslkI 8l+h/HHV88hpFJBhVBT+8iXqNQUzYDATQR+N0zIUhO4SLyWGmhFRysiS/qgjVvYOnKzd8sNALWFEb TVkRzAMWjfGnx7YURGJewlS5V+v53yZolCpOqPMnuuHKh6300JyrcQqmC0IzTbOVWiwlFY4x7nwSi N2q8WoxbB2fKWT1ATAw+oAU6mkXbkkbWxKbqUhKw352ENOE4MX5CloLrVxq6VM8+pMypHmvoIze4h Cp+TRhJQ==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0:897c:6038:c71d:ecac] by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j9uc4-0000dn-4v; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:48:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [v5] Documentation: bootconfig: Update boot configuration documentation To: Markus Elfring , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu , Steven Rostedt , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <158339065180.26602.26457588086834858.stgit@devnote2> <158339066140.26602.7533299987467005089.stgit@devnote2> <3fb124a6-07d2-7a40-8981-07561aeb3c1e@web.de> <29c599ef-991d-a253-9f27-5999fb55b228@web.de> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <997f73af-dc6c-bc8b-12ba-69270ee4b95d@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:48:47 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <29c599ef-991d-a253-9f27-5999fb55b228@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On 3/5/20 9:30 AM, Markus Elfring wrote: >>> How does this feedback fit to known concerns around the discussed wordings? >> >> As far as I am concerned, it means that the documentation is >> sufficiently good enough to be useful and not difficult to read. > > Would you like to add anything to my previous review comments > (besides simple typo adjustments)? If you would (could) be more concrete (or discrete) in your suggestions, I would be glad to comment on them. > > >> It does not mean that it's perfect. Patches can still be made to it. > > I hope that corresponding agreements will be achieved for > further improvements. -- ~Randy