From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>,
Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: Use policy->min/max init as QoS request
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 13:58:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99eb1963-dadc-44e6-9e67-814ed7089379@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bflxwyho5epheovbjnzlsvgvoitaqjbiv7kxcwbnoiz2nlmuvv@dtunrpupeyie>
Hello Viresh,
On 5/20/26 12:03, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-05-26, 15:55, Pierre Gondois wrote:
>> @@ -1399,8 +1399,16 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>
>> static int cpufreq_policy_init_qos(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> {
>> + unsigned int min_freq, max_freq;
>> int ret;
>>
>> + /* Use policy->min/max set by the driver as QoS requests. */
>> + min_freq = max(FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE, policy->min);
>> + if (policy->max)
>> + max_freq = min(FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE, policy->max);
>> + else
>> + max_freq = FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE;
>> +
> Why is this required to be done before setting policy->min/max ? And
> so I don't think patch 1/4 is required at all.
Sorry if I misunderstand, but if we do:
"""
/*
* If the driver didn't set policy->min/max, set them as
* they are used to clamp frequency requests.
*/
policy->min = policy->min ? policy->min : policy->cpuinfo.min_freq;
policy->max = policy->max ? policy->max : policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
/* Use policy->min/max set by the driver as QoS requests. */
min_freq = max(FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE, policy->min);
if (policy->max)
max_freq = min(FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE, policy->max);
else
max_freq = FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE;
"""
then drivers that don't set policy->min/max in their .init() callback
will end up with a QoS constraint of:
[cpuinfo.min_freq:cpuinfo.max_freq].
This would bring us to what the following patch tried to solve:
521223d8b3ec ("cpufreq: Fix initialization of min and max
frequency QoS requests")
------
About removing patch [1/4], Zhongqiu noted that policy->min/max should
be set before the CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notifier [1].
I then thought it would be better to save policy->min/max values
that are meant to become QoS constraint:
- as close as possible to the cpufreq_driver->init() call
- in a separate function, to do all the QoS creation in a separate
function.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/73fac9ca-451d-49f0-b9c7-5ef6bc0119bf@oss.qualcomm.com/
>> /*
>> * If the driver didn't set policy->min/max, set them as
>> * they are used to clamp frequency requests.
>> @@ -1418,12 +1426,12 @@ static int cpufreq_policy_init_qos(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> }
>>
>> ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints, &policy->min_freq_req,
>> - FREQ_QOS_MIN, FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE);
>> + FREQ_QOS_MIN, min_freq);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>> ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints, &policy->max_freq_req,
>> - FREQ_QOS_MAX, FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE);
>> + FREQ_QOS_MAX, max_freq);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 13:55 [PATCH v2 0/4] cpufreq: Set policy->min and max as real QoS constraints Pierre Gondois
2026-05-11 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cpufreq: Extract cpufreq_policy_init_qos() function Pierre Gondois
2026-05-19 13:51 ` Zhongqiu Han
2026-05-28 8:55 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-05-20 8:10 ` Jie Zhan
2026-05-11 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: Set default policy->min/max values for all drivers Pierre Gondois
2026-05-20 8:12 ` Jie Zhan
2026-05-22 5:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2026-05-28 8:55 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-05-11 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: Remove driver default policy->min/max init Pierre Gondois
2026-05-20 8:15 ` Jie Zhan
2026-05-11 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: Use policy->min/max init as QoS request Pierre Gondois
2026-05-20 8:38 ` Jie Zhan
2026-05-21 11:58 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-05-25 1:05 ` Jie Zhan
2026-05-20 10:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2026-05-21 11:58 ` Pierre Gondois [this message]
2026-05-22 5:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2026-05-21 11:26 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-05-21 11:58 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-05-22 5:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] cpufreq: Set policy->min and max as real QoS constraints Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99eb1963-dadc-44e6-9e67-814ed7089379@arm.com \
--to=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox