From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 871F7535FC8 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790119858; cv=none; b=He8tzcNQB0pXBjDYyruUF/F6O+CAgkgo7ky1Kf/C+FK3w/maq6OQMoUaimeEusbb4ByjGjiAIKHAxnSXLlNj/usNW1FC9DADTRpyH6ODYKu3bT0wHjWdyJav00ONCt7L970cC5PNP0cENiClqs9GRJ7cK7SU1vNKNoVld7tlOSY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790119858; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IGAKDJgi2dJx6WJK/BkSLxg7707mBJgxdKRPlFR4c3U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tynqTooE621i+KEpKqNjmRgQN5MqKzZSqjgauBvn0aXEaMghVXmBVvrvjWqBRkbQ7XUsuFiO/v+4vYNTkDinyCtvgf2D06d9XzykadoTs7TQlVw3awXOFB0hpOD9jdiYNpCnoOD2+lptS+w0gflKgXN1jUXb3V/NzNjXJPMcJCQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=P+gwHj4J; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="P+gwHj4J" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1790119855; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q5+YBN+Xt2oI+X9FvnLri1OubT6BbtyJ9+8TD+cFyTU=; b=P+gwHj4JgtZLSVDD/hljHDriqlYnQ/foi2xt9J8l34s//M+aPGbEiMAaBuK9RLIGwUgEak N1BKlcp5QiKS8x8zqTUIKcA+3DbF6VaxXWcRHYyi4W5MPLSQGfD35JH4x4wZlOsNg1nDi0 YuWQEO7xF7ssAoK0pOtxqmr4E6C/M6s= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-311-o3JUVDV5OMqaUhTNzsUouw-1; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 19:30:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: o3JUVDV5OMqaUhTNzsUouw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: o3JUVDV5OMqaUhTNzsUouw_1790119851 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7836E1955F24; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.91.18.181] (headnet04.pony-001.prod.iad2.dc.redhat.com [10.2.32.116]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4811956095; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9fadb6a1-df92-4c8f-96f3-f5fdf43e68d4@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 19:30:46 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] docs: cgroup-v2: Correct cpuset CPU descriptions To: Guopeng Zhang , Ridong Chen Cc: Tejun Heo , Johannes Weiner , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guopeng Zhang References: <20260922092034.68840-1-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US From: Waiman Long In-Reply-To: <20260922092034.68840-1-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 On 9/22/26 5:20 AM, Guopeng Zhang wrote: > From: Guopeng Zhang > > The cpuset interface documentation says cpuset.cpus.isolated is empty > unless an isolated partition exists, omitting CPUs isolated at boot with > isolcpus=domain. Its cpuset.cpus.effective description also assumes CPUs > come from the immediate parent and are normally a subset of > cpuset.cpus, which is not always true for valid non-root partition roots. > > Update both descriptions to match the existing behavior. > > Changes since v2: > - Update the valid partition root example to show that an offline CPU > can remain in cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective while being excluded > from cpuset.cpus.effective. > - Add the Reviewed-by tag to patch 2. > - Patch 1 is unchanged. > > Guopeng Zhang (2): > docs: cgroup-v2: Describe boot-isolated CPUs in cpuset.cpus.isolated > docs: cgroup-v2: Describe effective CPUs of partition roots > > Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) For the patch series, Reviewed-by: Waiman Long