From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99137C433E2 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C8E20786 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=cmpwn.com header.i=@cmpwn.com header.b="gT8Mt4vz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728661AbgICPsx (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:48:53 -0400 Received: from mail.cmpwn.com ([45.56.77.53]:39254 "EHLO mail.cmpwn.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728458AbgICPsw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:48:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cmpwn.com; s=cmpwn; t=1599148131; bh=RCu+Icot5zVZef98hyrEmwiRsqPkaaL/zUGsPUU+mwY=; h=Cc:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gT8Mt4vzYm4KNrP8rkDL/zZaEsAa2YBsV+nPQ0dYmT+SxBNR4DsPF5gX1pVtp/oLi MjlKAIpigXp50GFr24az3civE1BJWYT1jmFjY2mr9eJREUwkoMmWhMgBRAyB0/hmns e5iZocudHCRFTr4fTdQI1RmvSIlx87AinhW2cjr0= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] submitting-patches.rst: remove heading numbering From: "Drew DeVault" To: "Jonathan Corbet" Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:48:24 -0400 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20200903094411.3ca2652b@lwn.net> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Thu Sep 3, 2020 at 11:44 AM EDT, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > So why skip section 12 here? You get to that in a later patch, where it > becomes an unrelated change; it would be better to finish that task > here. Whoops, user error splitting up the patches. Sorry for the headache.