From: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Hridya Valsaraju" <hridya@google.com>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
"Liam Mark" <lmark@codeaurora.org>,
"Laura Abbott" <labbott@redhat.com>,
"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
"John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, "Zefan Li" <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Kalesh Singh" <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
Kenny.Ho@amd.com, "Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 5/8] dmabuf: Add gpu cgroup charge transfer function
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:48:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABdmKX0aF5zXozbb7npcEq3PgaeDE=gaGLf+jYY4oRKW9N+46g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405121245.GA30368@blackbody.suse.cz>
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 5:12 AM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 11:41:36AM -0700, "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com> wrote:
> > This link doesn't work for me, but I think you're referring to the
> > discussion about your "RAM_backed_buffers" comment from March 23rd.
>
> (Oops, it's a non-public message. But yes, you guessed it right ;-))
>
> > Anyway the test I did goes like this: enable memcg and gpu cgoups
> > tracking and run a process that allocates 100MiB of dmabufs. Observe
> > memcg and gpu accounting values before and after the allocation.
>
> Thanks for this measurement/dem/demoo.
>
> > Before
> > # cat memory.current gpu.memory.current
> > 14909440
> > system 0
> >
> > <Test program does the allocation of 100MiB of dmabufs>
> >
> > After
> > # cat memory.current gpu.memory.current
> > 48025600
> > system 104857600
> >
> > So the memcg value increases by about 30 MiB while the gpu values
> > increases by 100 MiB.
>
> > This is with kmem enabled, and the /proc/maps
> > file for this process indicates that the majority of that 30 MiB is
> > kernel memory.
>
> > I think this result shows that neither the kernel nor process memory
> > overlap with the gpu cgroup tracking of these allocations.
>
> It depends how the semantics of the 'system' entry is defined, no?
> As I grasped from other thread, the 'total' is going to be removed, so
> 'system' represents exclusively device memory?
>
That's right. The system charges (soon to be renamed "system-heap")
result only from an allocator (in this case the system heap) deciding
to call gpucg_try_charge for the buffer which is entirely device
memory.
>
> > So despite the fact that these buffers are in main memory, they are
> > allocated in a way that does not result in memcg attribution. (It
> > looks to me like __GFP_ACCOUNT is not set for these.)
>
> (I thought you knew what dmabufs your program used :-p)
>
I'm coming up to speed on a lot of new-to-me code here. :)
Just for completeness, these buffers were allocated with
libdmabufheap's AllocSystem.
> So, the goal is to do the tracking and migrations only via the gpu cg
> layer, regardless how memcg charges it (or not).
>
> (I have no opinion on that, I'm just summing it so that we're on the
> same page.)
>
Yes, this reflects my intention and current state of the code in this series.
> Michal
Thanks,
T.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-05 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 3:59 [RFC v4 0/8] Proposal for a GPU cgroup controller T.J. Mercier
2022-03-28 3:59 ` [RFC v4 1/8] gpu: rfc: " T.J. Mercier
2022-03-28 3:59 ` [RFC v4 2/8] cgroup: gpu: Add a cgroup controller for allocator attribution of GPU memory T.J. Mercier
2022-03-29 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-30 20:56 ` T.J. Mercier
2022-04-04 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-04 17:49 ` T.J. Mercier
2022-03-28 3:59 ` [RFC v4 3/8] dmabuf: Use the GPU cgroup charge/uncharge APIs T.J. Mercier
2022-03-28 3:59 ` [RFC v4 4/8] dmabuf: heaps: export system_heap buffers with GPU cgroup charging T.J. Mercier
2022-03-28 14:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-28 18:28 ` T.J. Mercier
2022-03-29 8:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-29 17:52 ` T.J. Mercier
2022-03-28 3:59 ` [RFC v4 5/8] dmabuf: Add gpu cgroup charge transfer function T.J. Mercier
2022-03-29 15:21 ` Michal Koutný
2022-04-01 18:41 ` T.J. Mercier
2022-04-05 12:12 ` Michal Koutný
2022-04-05 17:48 ` T.J. Mercier [this message]
2022-03-28 3:59 ` [RFC v4 6/8] binder: Add a buffer flag to relinquish ownership of fds T.J. Mercier
2022-03-28 3:59 ` [RFC v4 7/8] binder: use __kernel_pid_t and __kernel_uid_t for userspace T.J. Mercier
2022-03-28 3:59 ` [RFC v4 8/8] selftests: Add binder cgroup gpu memory transfer test T.J. Mercier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABdmKX0aF5zXozbb7npcEq3PgaeDE=gaGLf+jYY4oRKW9N+46g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=Kenny.Ho@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hridya@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=lmark@codeaurora.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).