From: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: "Alvin Šipraga" <ALSI@bang-olufsen.dk>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"tobias@waldekranz.com" <tobias@waldekranz.com>,
"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"vladimir.oltean@nxp.com" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: realtek: add compatible strings for RTL8367RB-VB
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 04:48:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJq09z5hG7VkhkxdhVTUvA-dMJr6_ajkHYBZ6N2ROFXLz0gijQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YlgmG3mLlRKef+sy@lunn.ch>
> > > Is it too late to get rid of all those compatible strings from
> > > dt-bindings? And rtl8367s from the driver?
> > > We must add all supported devices to the doc as well, similar to mv88e6085.
> >
> > You can always try! I'm OK with those things in principle, but others might
> > object due to ABI reasons.
>
> Anything which is in a released Linus kernel is ABI and cannot be
> removed. Anything in net-next, or an -rcX kernel can still be changed.
rtl8367s was added for 5.18. I'll prepare a patch for net to remove it.
Now, about dt-bindings, I don't know what is the best approach. As
device-tree should not focus on Linux, it is strange to use a
compatible "rtl8365mb" just because it is the Linux subdriver name and
that name was just because it was the first device supported. Also,
once published, it is not good to break it.
Just to illustrate it better, these are the chip versions rtl8365mb.c
already supports or could support:
- rtl8363nb (not in dt)
- rtl8363nb-vb (not in dt)
- rtl8363sc (not in dt)
- rtl8363sc-vb (not in dt)
- rtl8364nb (not in dt)
- rtl8364nb-vb (not in dt)
- rtl8365mb (the first supported by rtl8365mb.c, maybe it should be
realtek,rtl8365mb-vc as rtl8365mb and rtl8365mb-vb seems to exist and
they might be incompatible)
- rtl8366sc (not in dt)
- rtl8367rb-vb (not in dt)
- rtl8367s (in dt and referenced in the code. The one I'll remove from code)
- rtl8367sb (new)
- rtl8370mb (new)
- rtl8310sr (new)
and these are the ones referenced in rtl8366rb.c code:
- rtl8366rb (rtl8366rb.c)
- rtl8366s (removed from rtl8366rb.c recently)
but I know nothing about unsupported chip versions. These "models" are
referenced in the bindings but some of them are not really a chip,
like rtl8367 and rtl8367b:
- rtl8366 (??)
- rtl8367 (??)
- rtl8367b (??)
- rtl8367rb (??)
- rtl8368s (??)
- rtl8369 (??)
- rtl8370 (??)
Anyway, I'm planning on submitting something like this:
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/realtek.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/realtek.yaml
@@ -31,28 +31,14 @@ properties:
compatible:
enum:
- realtek,rtl8365mb
- - realtek,rtl8366
- realtek,rtl8366rb
- - realtek,rtl8366s
- - realtek,rtl8367
- - realtek,rtl8367b
- - realtek,rtl8367rb
- - realtek,rtl8367s
- - realtek,rtl8368s
- - realtek,rtl8369
- - realtek,rtl8370
description: |
- realtek,rtl8365mb: 4+1 ports
- realtek,rtl8366: 5+1 ports
- realtek,rtl8366rb: 5+1 ports
- realtek,rtl8366s: 5+1 ports
- realtek,rtl8367:
- realtek,rtl8367b:
- realtek,rtl8367rb: 5+2 ports
- realtek,rtl8367s: 5+2 ports
- realtek,rtl8368s: 8 ports
- realtek,rtl8369: 8+1 ports
- realtek,rtl8370: 8+2 ports
+ realtek,rtl8365mb:
+ Use with models RTL8363NB, RTL8363NB-VB, RTL8363SC, RTL8363SC-VB,
+ RTL8364NB, RTL8364NB-VB, RTL8365MB, RTL8366SC, RTL8367RB-VB, RTL8367S,
+ RTL8367SB, RTL8370MB, RTL8310SR
+ realtek,rtl8367rb:
+ Use with models RTL8366RB, RTL8366S
mdc-gpios:
description: GPIO line for the MDC clock line.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-15 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-11 21:04 [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: realtek: add compatible strings for RTL8367RB-VB Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-04-12 0:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-04-12 4:12 ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-04-12 12:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-04-12 13:30 ` Alvin Šipraga
2022-04-13 18:29 ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-04-13 18:40 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-04-14 1:40 ` Alvin Šipraga
2022-04-12 10:50 ` Alvin Šipraga
2022-04-13 18:38 ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-04-14 1:45 ` Alvin Šipraga
2022-04-14 2:32 ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
2022-04-14 11:37 ` Alvin Šipraga
2022-04-14 13:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-04-15 7:48 ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca [this message]
2022-04-15 14:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-04-16 6:27 ` Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJq09z5hG7VkhkxdhVTUvA-dMJr6_ajkHYBZ6N2ROFXLz0gijQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luizluca@gmail.com \
--cc=ALSI@bang-olufsen.dk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arinc.unal@arinc9.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tobias@waldekranz.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).