linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	lizefan.x@bytedance.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	mgorman@suse.de, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	bristot@redhat.com, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	macro@orcam.me.uk, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	mike.kravetz@oracle.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	cgroups mailinglist <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cgroup: make per-cgroup pressure stall tracking configurable
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 19:05:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpFW_LkqcmC_0FE8fyBY75yXYAjeLnOxU0-0R8WxksYoSA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpGx7w2E8Bq7jcq7HS41i40r4Lp+-z9m1P095B+MkAOWqg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:31 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 12:52:32PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > After reworking the code to add a static key I had to expand the
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS section, so I think a code refactoring below
> > > would make sense. It localizes config-specific code and it has the
> > > same exact code for CONFIG_CGROUPS=n and for
> > > cgroup_psi_enabled()==false. WDYT?:
> > >
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
> > > @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ struct psi_group psi_system = {
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static void psi_avgs_work(struct work_struct *work);
> > > +static void cgroup_iterator_init(void);
> > >
> > >  static void group_init(struct psi_group *group)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -211,6 +212,8 @@ void __init psi_init(void)
> > >                  return;
> > >          }
> > >
> > > +        cgroup_iterator_init();
> > > +
> > >          psi_period = jiffies_to_nsecs(PSI_FREQ);
> > >          group_init(&psi_system);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -742,11 +745,31 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group
> > > *group, int cpu,
> > >                  schedule_delayed_work(&group->avgs_work, PSI_FREQ);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static struct psi_group *iterate_groups(struct task_struct *task, void **iter)
> > > +static inline struct psi_group *sys_group_iterator(struct task_struct *task,
> > > +                                                   void **iter)
> > >  {
> > > +        *iter = &psi_system;
> > > +        return &psi_system;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
> > > +
> > > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(psi_cgroups_disabled);
> > > +
> > > +static void cgroup_iterator_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +        if (!cgroup_psi_enabled())
> > > +                static_branch_enable(&psi_cgroups_disabled);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct psi_group *iterate_groups(struct task_struct *task, void **iter)
> > > +{
> > >          struct cgroup *cgroup = NULL;
> > >
> > > +        /* Skip to psi_system if per-cgroup accounting is disabled */
> > > +        if (static_branch_unlikely(&psi_cgroups_disabled))
> > > +                return *iter ? NULL : sys_group_iterator(task, iter);
> > > +
> > >          if (!*iter)
> > >                  cgroup = task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp;
> >
> > That looks over-engineered. You have to check iter whether cgroups are
> > enabled or not. Pulling the jump label check up doesn't save anything,
> > but it ends up duplicating code.
> >
> > What you had in the beginning was better, it just had the system label
> > in an unexpected place where it would check iter twice in a row.
> >
> > The (*iter == &psi_system) check inside the cgroups branch has the
> > same purpose as the (*iter) check in the else branch. We could
> > consolidate that by pulling it up front.
> >
> > If we wrap the entire cgroup iteration block into the static branch,
> > IMO it becomes a bit clearer as well.
> >
> > How about this?
> >
> > static struct psi_group *iterate_groups(struct task_struct *task, void **iter)
> > {
> >         if (*iter == &psi_system)
> >                 return NULL;
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
> >         if (!static_branch_likely(&psi_cgroups_disabled)) {
> >                 struct cgroup *cgroup = NULL;
> >
> >                 if (!*iter)
> >                         cgroup = task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp;
> >                 else
> >                         cgroup = cgroup_parent(*iter);
> >
> >                 if (cgroup && cgroup_parent(cgroup)) {
> >                         *iter = cgroup;
> >                         return cgroup_psi(cgroup);
> >                 }
> >         }
> > #endif
> >
> >         *iter = &psi_system;
> >         return &psi_system;
> > }
>
> This looks great to me. Will use it in the next version. Thanks!

V2 is posted at https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1430980

      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-13 17:53 [PATCH 1/1] cgroup: make per-cgroup pressure stall tracking configurable Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-05-14 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-14 15:54   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-05-14 17:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-14 18:20       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-05-14 18:50         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-05-16 19:52           ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-05-17 18:31             ` Johannes Weiner
2021-05-17 20:02               ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-05-18  2:05                 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJuCfpFW_LkqcmC_0FE8fyBY75yXYAjeLnOxU0-0R8WxksYoSA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).